@LennartVerhagen @Abebab @lebzafosho Neither did I. Fact it this is an important measure most serious research institutions use for promotion, whether you like it or not. https://t.co/UvFHWRIdy4
@Divorytaur @Abebab @lebzafosho I have never claimed IF is the ultimate solution and without issues (more so for the social sciences). Fact is this is sill a measure that most serious research institutions use fr promotion, whether you like it or nor. https://t.co/UvFHWRIdy4
@statsepi @Abebab @lebzafosho @DORAssessment Let me guess, you are not from a natural science background. We tend to more faith in impact factors of journals and H-index of academics, although not blind faith. Whether you like it or not, these are universally used by serious institutions. See https://t.co/UvFHWRIdy4
IF is still largely used for review, promotion, and tenure in US and Canada, suggesting that "there is work to be done" to improve those processes to avoid potential misuse of such metrics. Journal Impact Factor in evaluations https://t.co/cFysnFcJSo via @PeerJPreprints
The continued "impact" of the Journal Impact Factor for review, promotion and tenure evaluations should not be underestimated, according to this preprint https://t.co/1qTMMZ1t6I and https://t.co/uDtATvfUcK @PeerJPreprints
@brembs @jordanyaron @mbeisen Ooh, this could be an interesting supplement to 'Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations'
https://t.co/sXCjiXddCZ
New #preprint results show use of Journal #ImpactFactor still "encouraged" in academic review, promotion & tenure evals; proving "there is work to be done" to improve those processes to avoid potential misuse of such metrics – via @emckiernan13 et al:
https://t.co/NqGkItrlPw
New #preprint results show use of Journal #ImpactFactor still "encouraged" in academic review, promotion & tenure evals; proving "there is work to be done" to improve those processes to avoid potential misuse of such metrics – via @emckiernan13 et al:
https://t.co/NqGkItIWH4