9 Citations   Views   Downloads

Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations

View preprint
Journal Impact Factor in evaluations https://t.co/l0x6kTkdY9 via @PeerJPreprints
RT @miriancramirez: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations https://t.co/XSvD1r72OA (researc…
RT @miriancramirez: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations https://t.co/XSvD1r72OA (researc…
RT @miriancramirez: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations https://t.co/XSvD1r72OA (researc…
133 days ago
RT @miriancramirez: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations https://t.co/XSvD1r72OA (researc…
Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations https://t.co/XSvD1r72OA (research article preprint) via @PeerJPreprints #bibliometrics #JIF #researchmetrics
171 days ago
2- McKiernan EC, Schimanski LA, Muñoz Nieves C, Matthias L, Niles MT, Alperin JP. 2019. Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations. PeerJ Preprints 7:e27638v2 https://t.co/6lmH8ih2uu
https://t.co/0HX2kxrwvV via @PeerJPreprints
https://t.co/OmAFjfTGht
@RalitsaMadsen @FEBSJournal @CamOpenData @ResearchDataUoE @ukrepro @BMATscientists @jebs284 Journal Impact Factor is still used in the majority of US&Canadian university tenure promotion documents, despite flaws and DORA: https://t.co/rntmmFZbQt
328 days ago
RT @DORAssessment: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations https://t.co/KpXmzAPOzD
329 days ago
RT @DORAssessment: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations https://t.co/KpXmzAPOzD
RT @DORAssessment: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations https://t.co/KpXmzAPOzD
RT @DORAssessment: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations https://t.co/KpXmzAPOzD
RT @DORAssessment: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations https://t.co/KpXmzAPOzD
RT @DORAssessment: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations https://t.co/KpXmzAPOzD
330 days ago
RT @DORAssessment: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations https://t.co/KpXmzAPOzD
RT @DORAssessment: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations https://t.co/KpXmzAPOzD
RT @DORAssessment: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations https://t.co/KpXmzAPOzD
RT @DORAssessment: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations https://t.co/KpXmzAPOzD
RT @DORAssessment: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations https://t.co/KpXmzAPOzD
RT @DORAssessment: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations https://t.co/KpXmzAPOzD
RT @DORAssessment: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations https://t.co/KpXmzAPOzD
RT @DORAssessment: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations https://t.co/KpXmzAPOzD
RT @DORAssessment: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations https://t.co/KpXmzAPOzD
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental information: Mentions of the Journal Impact Factor in review, promotion, and tenure documents

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27638v2/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Erin McKiernan is a member of the DORA Steering Committee and an advisor for the Metrics Toolkit, both volunteer positions. The authors declare they have no other competing interests.

Author Contributions

Erin C. McKiernan conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Lesley A. Schimanski conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Carol Muñoz Nieves analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Lisa Matthias analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Meredith T. Niles conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Juan Pablo Alperin conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Data is available via Harvard Dataverse. The full citation is:

Alperin, Juan Pablo; Muñoz Nieves, Carol; Schimanski, Lesley; McKiernan, Erin C.; Niles, Meredith T., 2018, "Terms and Concepts found in Tenure and Promotion Guidelines from the US and Canada", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VY4TJE, Harvard Dataverse, V3, UNF:6:PQC7QoilolhDrokzDPxxyQ== [fileUNF]

Funding

This study was supported by the Open Society Foundations [OR2016-29841]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies