Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations

RT @Protohedgehog: Critical: "87% of the institutions that mentioned the Journal Impact Factor supported the metric’s use in at least one o…
RT @Protohedgehog: Critical: "87% of the institutions that mentioned the Journal Impact Factor supported the metric’s use in at least one o…
RT @Protohedgehog: Critical: "87% of the institutions that mentioned the Journal Impact Factor supported the metric’s use in at least one o…
RT @Protohedgehog: Critical: "87% of the institutions that mentioned the Journal Impact Factor supported the metric’s use in at least one o…
2475 days ago
RT @Protohedgehog: Critical: "87% of the institutions that mentioned the Journal Impact Factor supported the metric’s use in at least one o…
RT @Protohedgehog: Critical: "87% of the institutions that mentioned the Journal Impact Factor supported the metric’s use in at least one o…
RT @petersuber: From @emckiernan13 et al: "87% of institutions that mentioned the #JIF supported [its] use...while 13% of institutions expr…
RT @AdamEyreWalker: the use of the impact factor in review, promotion and tenure https://t.co/hd77eh9uEg
RT @Protohedgehog: Critical: "87% of the institutions that mentioned the Journal Impact Factor supported the metric’s use in at least one o…
the use of the impact factor in review, promotion and tenure https://t.co/hd77eh9uEg
RT @rmounce: Damning evidence that change is urgently needed in review, promotion and tenure processes https://t.co/GXXdTBBQXD thanks @emck…
RT @petersuber: From @emckiernan13 et al: "87% of institutions that mentioned the #JIF supported [its] use...while 13% of institutions expr…
2475 days ago
RT @martin_eve: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations https://t.co/1B6bHS8f6L
RT @petersuber: From @emckiernan13 et al: "87% of institutions that mentioned the #JIF supported [its] use...while 13% of institutions expr…
RT @Protohedgehog: Critical: "87% of the institutions that mentioned the Journal Impact Factor supported the metric’s use in at least one o…
2475 days ago
RT @petersuber: From @emckiernan13 et al: "87% of institutions that mentioned the #JIF supported [its] use...while 13% of institutions expr…
2475 days ago
RT @Protohedgehog: Critical: "87% of the institutions that mentioned the Journal Impact Factor supported the metric’s use in at least one o…
RT @Protohedgehog: Critical: "87% of the institutions that mentioned the Journal Impact Factor supported the metric’s use in at least one o…
2475 days ago
RT @Protohedgehog: Critical: "87% of the institutions that mentioned the Journal Impact Factor supported the metric’s use in at least one o…
2475 days ago
RT @bernardrentier: It’s time to move ahead with the way evaluations of researchers are conducted. A recent survey [https://t.co/jOUj5OrUxB…
RT @petersuber: From @emckiernan13 et al: "87% of institutions that mentioned the #JIF supported [its] use...while 13% of institutions expr…
RT @bernardrentier: It’s time to move ahead with the way evaluations of researchers are conducted. A recent survey [https://t.co/jOUj5OrUxB…
RT @Protohedgehog: Critical: "87% of the institutions that mentioned the Journal Impact Factor supported the metric’s use in at least one o…
2475 days ago
RT @Protohedgehog: Critical: "87% of the institutions that mentioned the Journal Impact Factor supported the metric’s use in at least one o…
RT @juancommander: Best outcome I can envision for our work on Review, Promotion, and Tenure is for faculty to take a long hard look at wha…