Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations

2398 days ago
RT @JelteWicherts: Study of the policies at 129 universities 381 academic units highlights the widespread use of journal Impact Factors in…
RT @JelteWicherts: Study of the policies at 129 universities 381 academic units highlights the widespread use of journal Impact Factors in…
RT @JelteWicherts: Study of the policies at 129 universities 381 academic units highlights the widespread use of journal Impact Factors in…
Study of the policies at 129 universities 381 academic units highlights the widespread use of journal Impact Factors in academic review, tenure, and promotion evaluations @emckiernan13 https://t.co/SgMTDh3WEh https://t.co/XTMLkWsgFJ
RT @verokiermer: If review, tenure and promotion continue to depend on impact factor, we perpetuate a skewed incentive system. An important…
2398 days ago
RT @verokiermer: If review, tenure and promotion continue to depend on impact factor, we perpetuate a skewed incentive system. An important…
RT @PeerCommunityIn: 1/4 About 40% of 57 research-intensive institutions (from a sample of 129 US & Canada univ. performed by McKiernan et…
2398 days ago
RT @verokiermer: If review, tenure and promotion continue to depend on impact factor, we perpetuate a skewed incentive system. An important…
RT @juancommander: We are in @NatureNews! "Impact factors are still widely used in academic evaluations". Quick facts: 40% of R-type unis…
RT @PeerCommunityIn: 1/4 About 40% of 57 research-intensive institutions (from a sample of 129 US & Canada univ. performed by McKiernan et…
RT @juancommander: We are in @NatureNews! "Impact factors are still widely used in academic evaluations". Quick facts: 40% of R-type unis…
RT @PeerCommunityIn: 1/4 About 40% of 57 research-intensive institutions (from a sample of 129 US & Canada univ. performed by McKiernan et…
RT @verokiermer: If review, tenure and promotion continue to depend on impact factor, we perpetuate a skewed incentive system. An important…
2399 days ago
RT @juancommander: We are in @NatureNews! "Impact factors are still widely used in academic evaluations". Quick facts: 40% of R-type unis…
2399 days ago
RT @juancommander: We are in @NatureNews! "Impact factors are still widely used in academic evaluations". Quick facts: 40% of R-type unis…
RT @emckiernan13: Our new paper from the #RPT project is live! "Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure…
1/4 About 40% of 57 research-intensive institutions (from a sample of 129 US & Canada univ. performed by McKiernan et al. https://t.co/OusxH4rdBB) mention journal impact factors (IF) in documents used in the review, promotion & tenure process. Bad habits have a hard life...
https://t.co/PIcX52yiy3
2399 days ago
RT @emckiernan13: Our new paper from the #RPT project is live! "Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure…
RT @juancommander: Best outcome I can envision for our work on Review, Promotion, and Tenure is for faculty to take a long hard look at wha…
2399 days ago
RT @verokiermer: If review, tenure and promotion continue to depend on impact factor, we perpetuate a skewed incentive system. An important…
2399 days ago
RT @timothydbowman: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations - PeerJ https://t.co/RHYi5OC59D…
RT @verokiermer: If review, tenure and promotion continue to depend on impact factor, we perpetuate a skewed incentive system. An important…
RT @verokiermer: If review, tenure and promotion continue to depend on impact factor, we perpetuate a skewed incentive system. An important…
2399 days ago
RT @verokiermer: If review, tenure and promotion continue to depend on impact factor, we perpetuate a skewed incentive system. An important…