Ten myths around open scholarly publishing: Myth 10: Publishers add no value to the scholarly communication process https://t.co/PlAYp9hDil by @Protohedgehog et al
Ten myths around open scholarly publishing: Myth 9: Web of Science and Scopus are global databases of knowledge https://t.co/PlAYp9hDil by @Protohedgehog et al
Ten myths around open scholarly publishing: Myth 8: Embargo periods on ‘green’ OA are needed to sustain publishers https://t.co/PlAYp9hDil by @Protohedgehog et al
Ten myths around open scholarly publishing: Myth 7: Gold Open Access has to cost a lot of money for authors and is
synonymous with the APC business model https://t.co/PlAYp9hDil by @Protohedgehog et al
Ten myths around open scholarly publishing: Myth 6: Copyright transfer is required to publish and protect authors https://t.co/PlAYp9hDil by @Protohedgehog et al
Ten myths around open scholarly publishing: Myth 5: Open Access has created predatory publishers, and is universally
lower quality with lower standards of peer review https://t.co/PlAYp9hDil by @Protohedgehog et al
Ten myths around open scholarly publishing: Myth 4: Without journal-imposed peer review, the quality of science and the
scientific literature suffers https://t.co/PlAYp9hDil by @Protohedgehog et al