Ten myths around open scholarly publishing

RT @NAERJournal: https://t.co/qkzSuoGi8d
RT @NAERJournal: https://t.co/qkzSuoGi8d
2498 days ago
RT @NAERJournal: https://t.co/qkzSuoGi8d
https://t.co/qkzSuoGi8d
RT @TuSocialMedia: 10 mitos sobre las publicaciones académicas en
RT @TuSocialMedia: 10 mitos sobre las publicaciones académicas en
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
2499 days ago
[tag] Ten myths around open scholarly publishing [PeerJ Preprints] https://t.co/ASWYpQkjNT
2499 days ago
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
2499 days ago
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
2499 days ago
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
2499 days ago
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
RT @ceciroz: Muy interesante preprint Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. PeerJ Preprints 7:e27580v1 https://t.co/8NlbERI3yI Especi…
RT @ceciroz: Muy interesante preprint Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. PeerJ Preprints 7:e27580v1 https://t.co/8NlbERI3yI Especi…
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
Ten myths around open scholarly publishing: Myth 10: Publishers add no value to the scholarly communication process https://t.co/PlAYp9hDil by @Protohedgehog et al
Ten myths around open scholarly publishing: Myth 9: Web of Science and Scopus are global databases of knowledge https://t.co/PlAYp9hDil by @Protohedgehog et al
RT @Protohedgehog: New at @PeerJPreprints: Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. We want your feedback! What did we get wrong? What c…
Ten myths around open scholarly publishing: Myth 8: Embargo periods on ‘green’ OA are needed to sustain publishers https://t.co/PlAYp9hDil by @Protohedgehog et al
Ten myths around open scholarly publishing: Myth 7: Gold Open Access has to cost a lot of money for authors and is synonymous with the APC business model https://t.co/PlAYp9hDil by @Protohedgehog et al
Ten myths around open scholarly publishing: Myth 6: Copyright transfer is required to publish and protect authors https://t.co/PlAYp9hDil by @Protohedgehog et al
Ten myths around open scholarly publishing: Myth 5: Open Access has created predatory publishers, and is universally lower quality with lower standards of peer review https://t.co/PlAYp9hDil by @Protohedgehog et al
Ten myths around open scholarly publishing: Myth 4: Without journal-imposed peer review, the quality of science and the scientific literature suffers https://t.co/PlAYp9hDil by @Protohedgehog et al