October 2016

Table of Contents - PeerJ Preprints

October 26, 2016 - Version: 3
, , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2196v3
October 1, 2016 - Version: 1
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2494v1
October 13, 2016 - Version: 3
, , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1721v3
October 1, 2016 - Version: 1
, , , , , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2493v1
October 10, 2016 - Version: 1
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2512v1
October 24, 2016 - Version: 1
, , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2545v1
October 18, 2016 - Version: 1
,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2538v1
October 16, 2016 - Version: 4
,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2487v4
October 28, 2016 - Version: 1
, , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2559v1
October 16, 2016 - Version: 1
,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2528v1
October 10, 2016 - Version: 1
, , ,
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2515v1
I told my colleagues that PeerJ is a journal where they need to publish if they want their paper to be published quickly and with the strict peer review expected from a good journal.
Sohath Vanegas,
PeerJ Author
View author feedback