Javascript is disabled in your browser. Please
enable Javascript
to view PeerJ.
October 2016
Table of Contents - PeerJ Preprints
Sorted by downloads
Publication date
Downloads
Pageviews
Preprints
PeerJ - Medicine articles
PeerJ - Biology & Life science articles
PeerJ - General bio (stats, legal, policy, edu)
PeerJ Computer Science
PeerJ Preprints
biogeography
biodiversity
Login to save + alerts
October 11, 2016 - Version: 1
Why to choose Random Forest to predict rare species distribution with few samples in large undersampled areas? Three Asian crane species models provide supporting evidence
Chunrong Mi
,
Falk Huettmann
,
Yumin Guo
,
Xuesong Han
,
Lijia Wen
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2517v1
October 2, 2016 - Version: 1
Precipitation and aridity index regulating spatial patterns of vegetation production and species diversity based on alpine grassland transect, Tibetan Plateau
Jian Sun
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2495v1
← Previous
1
Next →
Archives - Preprints
biogeography
biodiversity
2019
September
1
August
1
July
0
June
0
May
1
April
0
March
0
February
2
2018
December
1
November
1
October
4
September
0
August
2
July
2
June
1
May
2
April
5
March
12
February
4
January
1
2017
December
1
November
0
October
1
September
2
August
2
July
3
June
0
May
0
April
2
March
1
February
0
January
4
2016
December
1
November
0
October
2
September
2
August
1
July
2
June
1
May
0
April
1
March
0
February
0
January
1
2015
December
2
November
3
October
1
September
0
August
1
July
2
June
0
May
3
April
0
March
1
February
1
2014
October
2
September
1
August
0
July
1
June
1
May
0
April
0
March
2
February
0
January
1
2013
November
1
October
1
September
0
August
1
July
0
June
0
May
1
Filter on subjects this month
biodiversity
2
biogeography
2
conservation-biology
1
ecology
1
ecosystem-science
1
zoology
1
I told my colleagues that PeerJ is a journal where they need to publish if they want their paper to be published quickly and with the strict peer review expected from a good journal.
Sohath Vanegas,
PeerJ Author
View author feedback