September 2022

Table of Contents - PeerJ (Medicine Articles)

Sorted by citations
  • Publication date
  • Citations
  • Downloads
  • Pageviews
Medicine
  • PeerJ - Medicine articles
  • PeerJ - Biology & Life science articles
  • PeerJ - General bio (stats, legal, policy, edu)
  • PeerJ Computer Science
  • PeerJ Preprints
medical-genetics bioinformatics molecular-biology
Login to save + alerts
September 20, 2022
Bioinformatics prediction and experimental verification of key biomarkers for diabetic kidney disease based on transcriptome sequencing in mice
Jing Zhao, Kaiying He, Hongxuan Du, Guohua Wei, Yuejia Wen, Jiaqi Wang, Xiaochun Zhou, Jianqin Wang
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13932 PubMed 36157062
September 13, 2022
Screening of potential key ferroptosis-related genes in sepsis
Shunan Cui, Kun Niu, Yining Xie, Shuo Li, Wenzhi Zhu, Ling Yu, Hongyu Tan
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13983 PubMed 36117534
  • ← Previous
  • 1
  • Next →

Archives - Medicine

medical-genetics bioinformatics molecular-biology
2024
  • April 1
  • March 1
  • February 1
2023
  • December 1
  • November 1
  • October 1
  • September 0
  • August 3
  • July 0
  • June 1
  • May 4
  • April 2
  • March 1
  • February 0
  • January 1
2022
  • September 2
  • August 1
  • July 0
  • June 1
  • May 1
  • April 0
  • March 1
  • February 2
  • January 2
2021
  • December 1
  • November 1
  • October 1
  • September 4
  • August 3
  • July 2
  • June 2
  • May 2
  • April 2
  • March 1
  • February 1
  • January 1
2020
  • December 1
  • November 2
  • October 0
  • September 2
  • August 0
  • July 1
2019
  • June 1

Filter on subjects this month

  • bioinformatics 2
  • diabetes-and-endocrinology 1
  • emergency-and-critical-care 1
  • infectious-diseases 1
  • medical-genetics 2
  • molecular-biology 2
  • nephrology 1
I told my colleagues that PeerJ is a journal where they need to publish if they want their paper to be published quickly and with the strict peer review expected from a good journal.
Sohath Vanegas,
PeerJ Author
View author feedback