Javascript is disabled in your browser. Please
enable Javascript
to view PeerJ.
May 2019
Table of Contents - PeerJ (
Medicine Articles
)
Sorted by citations
Publication date
Citations
Downloads
Pageviews
Medicine
PeerJ - Medicine articles
PeerJ - Biology & Life science articles
PeerJ - General bio (stats, legal, policy, edu)
PeerJ Computer Science
PeerJ Preprints
statistics
psychiatry-and-psychology
Login to save + alerts
May 24, 2019
We need to talk about reliability: making better use of test-retest studies for study design and interpretation
Granville J. Matheson
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6918
PubMed 31179173
May 14, 2019
Exploring perceptions of meaningfulness in visual representations of bivariate relationships
Nataly Beribisky
,
Heather Davidson
,
Robert A. Cribbie
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6853
PubMed 31139500
← Previous
1
Next →
Archives - Medicine
statistics
psychiatry-and-psychology
2024
January
1
2023
October
1
September
0
August
0
July
0
June
0
May
0
April
0
March
0
February
1
2022
September
1
August
1
July
0
June
0
May
0
April
1
2021
November
2
October
0
September
0
August
0
July
1
June
1
May
0
April
1
March
0
February
0
January
1
2020
December
1
November
1
October
1
September
1
August
0
July
1
June
0
May
0
April
0
March
2
2019
October
2
September
0
August
1
July
0
June
0
May
2
April
1
March
0
February
0
January
2
2018
November
1
October
0
September
3
August
0
July
2
June
1
May
1
April
0
March
1
2017
July
1
June
1
May
1
April
0
March
0
February
1
2016
December
1
November
0
October
3
September
3
August
1
July
1
June
0
May
0
April
2
March
0
February
1
January
2
2015
November
1
October
1
September
0
August
1
July
1
June
0
May
0
April
1
March
1
2014
March
1
February
1
Filter on subjects this month
neuroscience
1
psychiatry-and-psychology
2
radiology-and-medical-imaging
1
statistics
2
I told my colleagues that PeerJ is a journal where they need to publish if they want their paper to be published quickly and with the strict peer review expected from a good journal.
Sohath Vanegas,
PeerJ Author
View author feedback