• Article Spotlights
  • Contributors
  • Company News
  • Journal News
  • PeerJ Hubs
Assessing journal quality: Why a broad audience is a step towards tangible impact

Assessing journal quality: Why a broad audience is a step towards tangible impact

by PeerJ Community | Jun 22, 2017 | Community

Who reads your work and who are you intending to reach in publishing your research? As mentioned in a previous post on how researchers assess journal quality, authors decide where to publish based on a wide variety of determinations of impact, quality, and rigor....

Get PeerJ article alerts

It's Free. Enter your email or learn more.

Recent Posts

  • PeerJ Award Winners at ASI-IPFC12
  • PeerJ Award Winners at Southern African Society of Aquatic Scientist conference 2025
  • PeerJ Award Winners at EHBEA 2025
  • Article Spotlight: An unusual early-diverging plesiosauroid
  • Article Spotlight: A new neornithischian dinosaur from the Upper Jurassic Tiaojishan Formation

Recent Comments

  • Mike Taylor on Advice to My Younger Self – 5 Tips for Early Career Researchers | Professor John R. Hutchinson
  • Montero on Inferential statistics, p-values, and the quest to evaluate our hypotheses
  • hummell5635 on Student evaluations are biased against professors teaching quantitative courses – Author interview with Bob Uttl
  • Grimm on Author Survey Spotlight: What do researchers have to say about PeerJ’s submission system?
  • Dorothy Bishop on PeerJ Sections: New layout for community interaction and editorial curation

Archives

Links

Blog Feeds
All content is available under the CC BY 4.0 license unless otherwise noted
PeerJ Blog © 2023