July 2016

Table of Contents - PeerJ (Biology Articles)

July 13, 2016
,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2218 PubMed 27478706
July 28, 2016
, , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2185 PubMed 27547522
July 7, 2016
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2194 PubMed 27441123
July 5, 2016
, , , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2154 PubMed 27441114
July 5, 2016
, , ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2099 PubMed 27441108
July 6, 2016
, , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2189 PubMed 27441122
July 5, 2016
, , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2076 PubMed 27441107
July 14, 2016
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2213 PubMed 27478704
July 26, 2016
, , ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2268 PubMed 27547571
July 14, 2016
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2206 PubMed 27478703
July 14, 2016
, , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2224 PubMed 27478709
July 27, 2016
,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2270 PubMed 27547573
July 20, 2016
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2201 PubMed 27547527
July 28, 2016
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2263 PubMed 27547568
July 6, 2016
, , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2073 PubMed 27441106
July 26, 2016
,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2250 PubMed 27547556
July 19, 2016
, , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2105 PubMed 27547516
July 12, 2016
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2199 PubMed 27478701
July 14, 2016
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2230 PubMed 27478713
July 28, 2016
,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2295 PubMed 27547586
July 26, 2016
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2196 PubMed 27547525
July 5, 2016
,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2173 PubMed 27441117
July 28, 2016
,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2298 PubMed 27547587
July 14, 2016
, , ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2228 PubMed 27478712
July 27, 2016
, ,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2273 PubMed 27547575
I told my colleagues that PeerJ is a journal where they need to publish if they want their paper to be published quickly and with the strict peer review expected from a good journal.
Sohath Vanegas,
PeerJ Author
View author feedback