Very cool! Software Citation Principles (https://t.co/x3x1QKEp0W) is one of the most cited paper at @PeerJCompSci! Great showcase of the reach & impact of #FORCE11 working groups. Learn more about starting a FORCE11 WG here: https://t.co/OTuA3d8Ux1 https://t.co/GiMiaTnhBh
@anitawaard Probably today people put it in the methods section, but some of us would like them to do this via a formal citation to properly archived software (see https://t.co/GZE0jI7onh and https://t.co/sPu59ubqmd) cc @gchrupala
@amuellerml @researchremix I'd also like to have a way to cite version 1.0 directly (as software, not as paper) via a permanent identifier, as suggested in the Software Citation Principles (https://t.co/JQlZeHaCoZ). Is that currently possible?
@FranziDiehr Very good. Although I'd say this is good practice, best practice being to cite the versions used with authors and DOI/PID so they get credit
@npch gives overview on software citation work at @force11rescomm, starting with Software Citation Principles https://t.co/xDLVikh6TL https://t.co/gbiT9fGNt2
so it requires the same vigilance about giving credit where credit is due that we require of the conceptual and methodological contributions we normally cite. What's the best source we can quote back at this reviewer to make this point? This one? https://t.co/BJVtSOuo8i 2/2