@sjh5000 Update: You may want to look into "Schindler D, Bensmann F, Dietze S, Krüger F. 2022. The role of software in science: a knowledge graph-based analysis of software mentions in PubMed Central. PeerJ Computer Science 8:e835 https://t.co/t4NOSWo6ml
@vsoch @foreveremain @mleggott @SoftwareSaved @dave_s477 SoftwareKG contains almost 12 million software mentions across more than 3 million scholarly articles resolved to more than 600 thousand software. Sounds like we should merge. More info here: https://t.co/kKoYkKEqOc Data available from Zenodo: https://t.co/v3ZWwUwVyc
@pbarrosjr @VascoFRibeiro @rstatstweet Searching for R will likely overestimate the number of usages of #RStats. In https://t.co/kKoYkKDSYE we compared the frequencies of the most common statistical software tools across Pubmed Central. It turns out, R is a rising star
Mit welcher Software gearbeitet wurde, kann durchaus Auswirkungen auf die Interpretation von Forschungsergebnissen haben. Artikel gibt Überblick darüber, in welchen Disziplinen mit welcher Software gearbeitet wird und inwieweit diese zitiert wird: https://t.co/YyaVr73LqP
Did you know that CrystalExplorer is among the #Software that is most frequently cited across all articles in PubMed Central? We found 585 mentions, 543 of which are accompanied with a formal software citation (93%). More info at: https://t.co/kKoYkKDSYE https://t.co/qwc22fHHAM