Gender differences and bias in open source: pull request acceptance of women versus men

@ItsMeNee2 @steveivano @IrlRuth @MandysTake @CHSommers @Google Of course positive discrimination is good for biz only if there's actual discrimination, which is proven in tech: https://t.co/9e2ccV1Ynv
RT @ScientistMel: The peer reviewed article can be found here https://t.co/6wG4nYsdIz
RT @ScientistMel: The peer reviewed article can be found here https://t.co/6wG4nYsdIz
3057 days ago
RT @ScientistMel: The peer reviewed article can be found here https://t.co/6wG4nYsdIz
3057 days ago
The peer reviewed article can be found here https://t.co/6wG4nYsdIz
@WillMcAvoyACN Actually there is: females are better. https://t.co/2hY1PE8KpE
3058 days ago
RT @devvmh: women have more GitHub contributions accepted, but only if gender is hidden. study https://t.co/dmaUy1MMJv source https://t.c…
3058 days ago
RT @devvmh: women have more GitHub contributions accepted, but only if gender is hidden. study https://t.co/dmaUy1MMJv source https://t.c…
3058 days ago
women have more GitHub contributions accepted, but only if gender is hidden. study https://t.co/dmaUy1MMJv source https://t.co/amwXANa8WZ
3058 days ago
@dingding_peng @Pillownaut Here's a diff but similar study. Friend sent it to me. Haven't read yet. 1/ https://t.co/tcPYPaf1NN https://t.co/iX2v5CCstA
RT @jamuraa: Reminder: the only published study of software eng. by gender showed women were *more* likely to have code accepted. https://t…
3058 days ago
RT @jamuraa: Reminder: the only published study of software eng. by gender showed women were *more* likely to have code accepted. https://t…
@ItsMeNee2 @IrlRuth @steveivano @MandysTake @CHSommers @Google Plenty of proof of discrimination in the industry: https://t.co/9e2ccV1Ynv (Women judged as "better" than men, only when gender is hidden).
3059 days ago
RT @jamuraa: Reminder: the only published study of software eng. by gender showed women were *more* likely to have code accepted. https://t…
RT @jamuraa: Reminder: the only published study of software eng. by gender showed women were *more* likely to have code accepted. https://t…
3059 days ago
RT @jamuraa: Reminder: the only published study of software eng. by gender showed women were *more* likely to have code accepted. https://t…
RT @jamuraa: Reminder: the only published study of software eng. by gender showed women were *more* likely to have code accepted. https://t…
3059 days ago
RT @jamuraa: Reminder: the only published study of software eng. by gender showed women were *more* likely to have code accepted. https://t…
RT @jamuraa: Reminder: the only published study of software eng. by gender showed women were *more* likely to have code accepted. https://t…
3059 days ago
Reminder: the only published study of software eng. by gender showed women were *more* likely to have code accepted. https://t.co/bE8CRRJbi6
@steveivano @ItsMeNee2 @IrlRuth @MandysTake @CHSommers @Google Yep. Women judged better (when gender hidden). Thus, having recruiters hire the next wmn applicant is good for bsns. https://t.co/9e2ccV1Ynv
@Norro21 @twasink @hadleybeeman Yep, in software dev business there's evidence (link). Positive discr thus optimizes hiring quality (good for bssns) https://t.co/9e2ccV1Ynv
@ScepticSociety @Delafina777 Article is old (Feb 2016) and the study has since been peer reviewed: https://t.co/RCmrM5g7HQ I find the study's conclusion to be pertinent. https://t.co/bLCMYYHorv
RT @paul1kirby: 'Women coders are rated more highly than men in gender-blind tests. Lower if gender is known' https://t.co/jMesYDhizq https…
@jezhumble Nice. You might consider our gender bias study on pull request. https://t.co/BCPBVKuO0o PDF: https://t.co/Y46wSTTHGc