Contributions by role
Contributions by subject area
By Q&A topic
David Marjanović
Work details
PeerJ Contributions
Signed reviews submitted for articles published in PeerJ Note that some articles may not have the review itself made public unless authors have made them open as well.
Provided feedback on
**Accepted** for publication two days ago. The accepted version differs from this preprint in containing more and better explanations and a quantification of similarity between the...
Two mentions of "Appendix-Table 4" actually refer to Appendix-Table 6. One of them correctly links to Appendix-Table 6 in this pdf. The reference "Ezcurra (2012)" is cited in th...
The reference "Ruta (2011)" is cited in the text, but missing from the reference list; thanks to the reviewer Michael Buchwitz for pointing this out. It is: %%**Ruta, M. 2011.**...
Oops. I informed M. Ruta and the other colleagues I had asked for the matrix file, but then kept forgetting to add this here for the last few turbulent months: the confusion about...
PAUP* 4.0b10 has a bug that sometimes duplicates irreproducible numbers of most parsimonious trees. Consequently, the numbers of MPTs we report for Analyses R1, R2 and R4–R12 are w...
The Nomenclature section states that the paper by Pereira Pacheco et al. (2016) was not registered in ZooBank. It was; the identifier is between the abstract and the keywords. I ma...
Thanks to Brad McFeeters for pointing out that we cited Simmons (2011a, b) in the text (Why we only used maximum parsimony) but included only one Simmons (2011) in the references l...
In the Table of Contents, the page numbers from 82 onward are all one too high, i.e. the section claimed to begin on p. 82 really begins on p. 81 (just like the preceding one). The...
As required by PeerJ Preprints, this pdf was resized to **US Letter**. If anybody outside the US (or Canada?) wants to print it out, I recommend using [the original-sized version a...