Reef fishes belonging to the families Chaetodontidae, Labridae (Bonaldo & Bellwood, 2011), and Tetraodontidae (Jayewardene et al., 2009) make scars on the skeletons of corals when they graze on algae, epifauna and endofauna. It is suggested that grazing by parrotfishes in the Caribbean and on the Great Barrier Reef may have serious consequences for the dynamics of coral populations (Bruckner & Bruckner, 1998; Mumby, 2009; Bonaldo & Bellwood, 2011; Bonaldo, Krajewski & Bellwood, 2011; Bonaldo, Welsh & Bellwood, 2012; Bonaldo, Hoey & Bellwood, 2014; Cole et al., 2011). As the main target coral species for fish grazing, massive Porites species are the representative corals.
Six massive Porites species are known from marine waters of southwestern Japan (Nishihira & Veron, 1995). Many poritid species that have a massive colony morphology are known for their stress tolerance (Loya et al., 2001) and longevity, which may enable them to form relatively large colonies (several meters in diameter) compared with other coral species (Veron, 2000). Therefore, massive Porites species are thought to be ecologically important reef builders (Iguchi et al., 2014), and are often used for estimating past environmental conditions, including temperature (e.g., Gagan et al., 2000).
In shallow coral reef habitats around Okinawa Island (southwestern Japan), feeding scars are commonly observed on the surface of massive Porites colonies (Fig. 1). The scar densities vary among neighboring colonies, but the reasons for this variability have not been explored. Direct damage to live tissues caused by grazing can lead to serious problems for corals, as heavily damaged colonies die (e.g., Treeck & Schuhmacher, 1997), and this process contributes to the dynamics of coral populations. Furthermore, scars on massive Porites colonies may provide suitable settlement sites for macro-borers including vermetid gastropods (Dendropoma maximum) and Christmas tree worms (e.g., Spirobranchus giganteus) (Nishihira, 1996). Therefore, clarifying why grazing scar density variations occur on the surface of Porites spp. is important in determining the ecological processes affecting populations of these corals, and for understanding the establishment and maintenance of microscale biodiversity around Porites colonies.
Coral bleaching is one of the threats for degradation of coral reef ecosystems and caused mainly by thermal stress, followed by the breakdown of the symbiotic relationship between a coral and its symbiotic zooxanthellae (Hoegh-Guldberg, 1999). However, sympatric colonies often show variability in bleaching susceptibility (e.g., Jones et al., 2008), which is partially explained by differences in the types of zooxanthellae in the host tissues, particularly differences in stress tolerance between zooxanthellae of clades C and D (e.g., Baker, 2003). During summer in 2016, mass coral bleaching occurred in Sekisei Lagoon (southwestern Japan); it involved >95% of colonies, which bleached as a consequence of prolonged high seawater temperatures. It is reported that seawater temperatures in Sekisei Lagoon between June and September 2016 were over 30 °C (Ministry of the Environment, 2017). Among many bleached corals at 11 surveyed sites within an area of <100 m radius in the lagoon, we observed numerous bleached and non-bleached massive Porites colonies. At these sites we conducted scar density surveys of massive Porites species to investigate the influence of bleaching on fish grazing on these corals.
Materials and Methods
We selected 11 sites for the survey of massive Porites species (mainly Porites australiensis, P. lobata, and P. lutea) in Sekisei Lagoon (Fig. 2 and Table 1). The survey was carried out during 3–12 September 2016. Prior to taking place, the survey was approved by the Ministry of the Environment.
Underwater observations were conducted at each site using SCUBA. We recorded the following parameters for all massive Porites colonies found during a 30 min diving survey at each site: (i) the degree of scarring (5 stages: 0–4; see Fig. 3 for details); (ii) the maximum colony diameter as a measure of colony size, recorded in one of 5 categories (1: <30 cm; 2: 31–50 cm; 3: 51–80 cm; 4: 81–110 cm; 5: >111 cm); (iii) depth (m); and (iv) the occurrence of bleaching (bleached vs. non-bleached). In our preliminary survey, we calculated the degree of scarring as the area of grazing scars per that of the colony surface (Table S1). Based on the criteria, we judged the degree of scarring by visual inspection. We defined completely bleached colony not covered by algae as bleached one in this study. Thus, the colonies which we observed seemed to be alive because the dead colonies are soon covered by algae. We removed partially bleached colonies from our analysis. The grazing scars were clearly visible in the field, even on bleached colonies (Figs. 3E and 3F). For several grazed colonies we took high-magnification images of the grazing scars using a Keyence VHX-1000 digital microscope (Osaka, Japan). We also took digital images of all Porites colonies using a digital camera (TG-3; OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan) in an underwater housing (PT-056; OLYMPUS).
|No.||Latitude||Longitude||Depth (m)||No. of bleached colonies||No. of non-bleached colonies||Total no. of colonies|
|1||E24°14′54.5″||N124°01′50.0″||7.6 ± 1.5||6||9||15|
|2||E24°15′01.1″||N124°02′05.4″||6.4 ± 0.6||11||19||30|
|3||E24°15′04.1″||N124°06′03.0″||4.3 ± 1.3||10||20||30|
|4||E24°14′50.8″||N124°06′04.4″||13.7 ± 2.4||14||6||20|
|5||E24°12′45.5″||N123°55′14.7″||5.4 ± 1.5||12||26||38|
|6||E24°18′17.6″||N124°02′46.9″||8.3 ± 1.8||9||21||30|
|7||E24°22′02.5″||N124°01′27.0″||13.4 ± 1.4||12||18||30|
|8||E24°17′55.8″||N123°56′51.0″||4.5 ± 2.4||2||8||10|
|9||E24°18′18.4″||N123°58′04.3″||7.2 ± 2.6||8||9||17|
|10||E24°16′25.5″||N123°55′51.2″||10.5 ± 0.5||7||23||30|
|11||E24°20′00.0″||N124°04′18.3″||4.3 ± 0.9||7||9||16|
To investigate the occurrence of significant relationships among colony size, degree of scarring, and the depth of bleached and non-bleached colonies, we applied the Mann–Whitney U-test using software R ver. 3.2.4 (R Core Team, 2016). We used an ordered logistic regression model (a cumulative link mixed model) in which the response variable was the degree of scarring, and the explanatory variables were colony size, depth, bleaching occurrence, and site. This analysis was also performed using software R ver. 3.2.4 (R Core Team, 2016) and ordinal package (Christensen, 2015).
Results and Discussion
The results of field surveys of massive Porites species at the 11 sites within Sekisei Lagoon showed that 37% of the surveyed colonies were bleached (total number of observed colonies: 266; Table 1). The percentages of each degree of colony size are as follows; 1: 15.1%; 2: 54.1%; 3: 20.8%; 4: 7.5%; 5: 2.5%. Both bleached and non-bleached colonies were recorded at all sites (Fig. 4), but the number of grazing scars on non-bleached colonies was 2.88 times greater than that on bleached colonies (Fig. 5A; Mann–Whitney test, p < 0.01). We found no significant effect of colony size or habitat depth on the occurrence of bleaching (Figs. 5B and Fig. 5C; Mann–Whitney test, p > 0.1). The ordered logistic regression model analysis showed that the occurrence of bleaching was the explanatory variable that was significantly correlated with the degree of scarring (Z-score = −7.406; p < 0.01). In the case of site, no. 7 was also significant (Z-score = 2.177, p = 0.03) but other sites not. Colony size and depth were not significant explanatory variables (Z-scores = −0.268 and −0.864, respectively; both p values > 0.1).
Although we did not identify the cause of these variations, this is the first report suggesting a relationship between bleaching occurrence and grazing scar densities on massive colonies of Porites spp. during the period of a mass bleaching event. There are several possible explanations for the large variations in grazing scar densities on massive Porites colonies in the field. Firstly, corallivorous fishes may selectively choose colonies based on nutrition. For example, it is thought that the grazing scars caused by parrotfishes occur as they feed on coral tissues, but also on macro-borers (Rotjan & Lewis, 2005), from which they obtain additional nutrients not readily provided by herbivory. Thus, corallivorous fishes may select non-bleached colonies to obtain certain nutrients in addition to the energy derived from coral tissues (Rotjan & Lewis, 2009).
Furthermore, corallivorous fishes may selectively prey on coral colonies having thicker tissues, that may be originally tolerant to thermal stress (Loya et al., 2001), as potentially nutritious food sources. Lough & Barnes (2000) reported that the tissue thickness of massive Porites colonies varied among colonies and sites on the Great Barrier Reef. Reproductive stage of the coral may also attract grazer fishes. Rotjan & Lewis (2009) suggested that parrotfishes may selectively prey on the tissue of colonies of Montastrea annuralis containing mature eggs, because of its higher nutritional value. As massive Porites species are dioecious (Harriott, 1983), the scar densities may be variable among male and female colonies. Further studies are required to assess whether differences in coral tissue thickness can be detected by coral predators.
The various scar densities among colonies could be produced by random grazing of fishes. As the growth rates of massive Porites vary among colonies (Iguchi et al., 2012; Hayashi et al., 2013), the speed of healing of grazing scars on the colony surface is also likely to be highly variable among colonies. Massive Porites species are reported to suspend growth during bleaching events (Suzuki et al., 2003). In fast-growing colonies, the scars may rapidly be covered by newly formed live tissue, and as a result the colonies could appear to have fewer scars. On the other hand, in colonies having slow growth rates the scars may not heal rapidly, and their number on the surface could appear to be greater. In this context, the bleached colonies in Sekisei Lagoon should have had a much greater scar density than non-bleached colonies because of reduced growth (healing) during the bleaching period.
The imbalance between grazing frequency and/or intensity as a function of healing speed (colony growth) should determine the appearance of colonies, but the low scar densities observed for bleached colonies in Sekisei Lagoon cannot be explained by variations in the speed of scar healing. Therefore, we inferred that fishes selectively graze on non-bleached massive Porites colonies (or those less likely to be bleached). Future studies should investigate tissue thickness among grazed and non-grazed colonies, and reciprocal transplantation experiments using fragments of highly-grazed and non-grazed colonies should be performed to study the mechanisms underlying the temporal and spatial variations in scar densities on the surface of massive Porites colonies.