Reappraisal of the extinct seal “Phoca” vitulinoides from the Neogene of the North Sea Basin, with bearing on its geological age, phylogenetic affinities, and locomotion

View article
PeerJ

Main article text

 

Introduction

Historical Background

Materials and Methods

Specimens studied

The IRSNB collection

Recently acquired specimens

Comparative material

Measurements and body length estimates

Terminology

Phylogenetic analysis

Nomenclatural acts

Results

Geological context

Lithostratigraphy

Dinoflagellate cyst biostratigraphy

Systematic paleontology

  • Family PHOCIDAE Gray, 1821

  • Subfamily PHOCINAE Gray, 1821

  • NANOPHOCA gen. nov.

Neotype
Type locality
Type horizon and age
Diagnosis
Referred specimens
Comments

Description and comparison

Cranial skeleton

Maxilla

Axial skeleton

Atlas
Axis
Other cervical vertebrae
Thoracic vertebrae
Anterior thoracic vertebrae
Middle thoracic vertebrae
Posterior thoracic vertebrae
Lumbar vertebrae
Sacrum
Caudal vertebrae
Rib

Appendicular skeleton

Scapula
Humerus
Ulna
Radius
Innominate
Femur
Tibia–Fibula
Calcaneum
Astragalus
Metatarsals
Phalanx

Body length estimates

Phylogenetic analysis

Discussion

Body length

Functional anatomy of N. vitulinoides with notes on lever arms in anatomy

Lever arms in anatomy

Cervical versus lumbar vertebrae

Pectoral girdle

Humerus
Ulna
Radius

Pelvic girdle

Sacrum
Innominate
Femur
Tibia

Overall functional anatomy

Implications of the new phylogenetic analysis

Conclusion

Supplemental Information

Phylogenetic matrix including Praepusa magyaricus and Praepusa pannonica.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3316/supp-1

Supplemental Information to the reappraisal of Nanophoca vitulinoides.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3316/supp-2

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Leonard Dewaele conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, and reviewed drafts of the paper.

Eli Amson conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, and reviewed drafts of the paper.

Olivier Lambert conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, and reviewed drafts of the paper.

Stephen Louwye conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, and reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as Supplemental Dataset Files.

New Species Registration

The following information was supplied regarding the registration of a newly described species:

Publication LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1310A48E-A725-40E7-AFFB-D0A9043CFE04

Nanophoca gen. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:251A3A76-F85D-4905-8BF0-48BB97EE8A4D

Nanophoca vitulinoides (Van Beneden, 1877) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:CED9E2DD-DF9E-41BD-94C6-33C5C3B6F278

Funding

DL was financially supported through the FWO Ph.D. Fellowship program. EA was supported by the Swiss National Fund SNF 31003A_149605 granted to MR Sánchez-Villagra and subsequently by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

24 Citations 6,384 Views 1,189 Downloads