Three new species of Talaromyces sect. Talaromyces discovered in China

View article
Microbiology

Introduction

Talaromyces species are common fungi inhabiting various terrestrial, aquatic (freshwater and marine) and atmospheric environments, which play an important role either in the nutrient cycle of natural ecosystems or the sustainable development of society, for example, producing lignocellulolytic enzymes in plant biomass degradation, synthesizing bioactive secondary metabolites with medical importance, or as the biological control agents in agriculture, etc. But some species are opportunistic pathogens causing talaromycosis in humans and animals, such as T. marneffei (e.g., Yilmaz et al., 2014).

Talaromyces species are often encountered and readily recognized on isolating media due to their yellow, orange or reddish colors in the mycelium and/or substratum. However, in contrast to this superficial recognition, species in this genus are less distinguishable from each other by morphological characters in most cases, especially by micro-morphological characters. The molecular approach has to be used in the identification of these fungi. On the basis of four genetic loci, i.e., β-tubulin gene (BenA), calmodulin gene (CaM), DNA-dependent RNA polymerase II second largest subunit gene (Rpb2) and the nuclear rDNA ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 (ITS), and the integration with morphological characters, about 208 species have been reported in Talaromyces. The genus are currently resolved into eight sections, i.e., sections Bacillispori, Helici, Islandici, Purpurei, Subinflati, Talaromyces, Tenues and Trachyspermi (e.g., Samson et al., 2011; Yilmaz et al., 2014; Sun et al., 2020; Houbraken et al., 2020; Lacey et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2023; Nguyen & Lee, 2023; Špetík et al., 2023; Zang et al., 2023; Mo et al., 2024; Visagie et al., 2024; Okubo, Itagaki & Hirose, 2024). Sect. Talaromyces is the largest section which now includes about 90 species (Houbraken et al., 2020; Lacey et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2023; Nguyen & Lee, 2023; Visagie et al., 2024) (Table 1).

Table 1:
The ninety species reported in sect.
Talaromyces, their ex-types and genetic markers, and the three novelties proposed in this study.
Species Ex-types Genetic markes
ITS Ben A CaM Rpb2
T. aculeatus NRRL 2129 = CBS 289.48 KF741995 KF741929 KF741975 KM023271
T. adpressus CGMCC 3.18211 = CBS 140620 KU866657 KU866844 KU866741 KU867001
T. alveolaris CBS 142379 LT558969 LT559086 LT795596 LT795597 (antisense)
T. amazonensis CBS 140373 = IBT 23215 KX011509 KX011490 KX011502 MN969186
T. amestolkiae CBS 132696 = DTO 179F5 JX315660 JX315623 KF741937 JX315698
T. angelicae KACC 46611 KF183638 KF183640 KJ885259 KX961275
T. annesophieae CBS 142939 MF574592 MF590098 MF590104 MN969199
T. apiculatus CBS 312.59 = FRR 635 JN899375 KF741916 KF741950 KM023287
T. argentinensis NRRL 28750 MH793045 MH792917 MH792981 MH793108
T. aspriconidius CBS 141835 = DTO 340-F8 MN864274 MN863343 MN863320 MN863332
T. atkinsoniae BRIP 72528a OP059084 OP087524 N/A OP087523
T. aurantiacus CBS 314.59 = NRRL 3398 JN899380 KF741917 KF741951 KX961285
T. aureolinus AS3.15865 MK837953 MK837937 MK837945 MK837961
T. australis CBS 137102 = IBT 14256 KF741991 KF741922 KF741971 KX961284
T. bannicus AS3.15862 MK837955 MK837939 MK837947 MK837963
T. beijingensis CGMCC 3.18200 = CBS 140617 KU866649 KU866837 KU866733 KU866993
T. brevis CBS 118436 = DTO 004-D8 MN864269 MN863338 MN863315 MN863328
T. calidicanius CBS 112002 JN899319 HQ156944 KF741934 KM023311
T. californicus NRRL 58168 MH793056 MH792928 MH792992 MH793119
T. cavernicola URM 8448 ON862935 OP672383 OP290543 OP290515
T. cnidii KACC 46617 KF183639 KF183641 KJ885266 KM023299
T. coprophilus CBS 142756 LT899794 LT898319 LT899776 LT899812 (antisense)
T. cucurbitiradicus ACCC 39155 = CGMCC 3.26140 KY053254 KY053228 KY053246 OR242024 (CN090C2)*
T. derxii CBS 412.89 = NHL 2981 JN899327 JX494306 KF741959 KM023282
T. dimorphus AS3.15692 = NN072337 KY007095 KY007111 KY007103 KY112593
T. domesticus NRRL 58121 MH793055 MH792927 MH792991 MH793118
T. duclauxii CBS 322.48 = NRRL 1030 JN899342 JX091384 KF741955 JN121491
T. echinulatus CNUFC HB1206 OR462362 OR507571 OR608367 OR591610
T. euchlorocarpius DTO 176I3 = CBM PF1203 AB176617 KJ865733 KJ885271 KM023303
T. flavovirens CBS 102801 = IBT 27044 JN899392 JX091376 KF741933 KX961283
T. flavus CBS 310.38 NRRL 2098 JN899360 JX494302 KF741949 JF417426
T. francoae CBS 113134 = IBT 23221 KX011510 KX011489 KX011501 MN969188
T. funiculosus CBS 272.86 = IMI 193019 JN899377 JX091383 KF741945 KM023293
T. fuscoviridis CBS 193.69 = IBT 14846 KF741979 KF741912 KF741942 MN969156
T. fusiformis CGMCC 3.18210 = CBS 140637 KU866656 KU866843 KU866740 KU867000
T. galapagensis NRRL 13068 = CBS 751.74 JN899358 JX091388 KF741966 MH793105
T. ginkgonis CGMCC 3.20698 OL638158 OL689844 OL689846 OL689848
T. haitouensis AS3.16101 MZ045695 MZ054634 MZ054637 MZ054631
T. indigoticus CBS 100534 = IBT 17590 JN899331 JX494308 KF741931 KX961278
T. intermedius CBS 152.65 = IMI 100874 JN899332 JX091387 KJ885290 KX961282
T. kabodanensis CBS 139564 = DTO 204-F2 KP851981 KP851986 KP851995 MN969190
T. johnpittii BRIP 72504a = MST-FP2594 OP712677 OP712647 OP712645 OP712646
T. kendrickii CBS 136666 = IBT 13593 KF741987 KF741921 KF741967 MN969158
T. lentulus AS3.15689 KY007088 KY007104 KY007096 KY112586
T. liani CBS 225.66 = NRRL 3380 JN899395 JX091380 KJ885257 MH793100
T. louisianensis NRRL 35823 MH793052 MH792924 MH792988 MH793115
T. macrosporus CBS 317.63 = FRR 404 JN899333 JX091382 KF741952 KM023292
T. mae AS3.15690 KY007090 KY007106 KY007098 KY112588
T. malicola NRRL 3724 MH909513 MH909406 MH909459 MH909567
T. mangshanicus AS3.18013 KX447531 KX447530 KX447528 KX447527
T. marneffei CBS 388.87 = IMI 068794ii JN899344 JX091389 KF741958 KM023283
T. muroii CBS 756.96 = PF 1153 MN431394 KJ865727 KJ885274 KX961276
T. mycothecae CBS 142494 MF278326 LT855561 LT855564 LT855567
T. nanjingensis JP-NJ4 = M 2012167 MW130720 MW147759 MW147760 MW147762
T. neofusisporus AS3.15415 = CBS 140623 KP765385 KP765381 KP765383 MN969165
T. oumae-annae CBS 138208 = DTO 269-E8 KJ775720 KJ775213 KJ775425 KX961281
T. panamensis CBS 128.89 = IMI 297546 JN899362 HQ156948 KF741936 KM023284
T. penicillioides AS3.15822 MK837956 MK837940 MK837948 MK837964
T. pinophilus CBS 631.66 = IMI 114933 JN899382 JX091381 KF741964 KM023291
T. pratensis NRRL 62170 MH793075 MH792948 MH793012 MH793139
T. primulinus CBS 321.48 = NRRL 1074 JN899317 JX494305 KF741954 KM023294
T. pseudofuniculosus CBS 143041 LT899796 LT898323 LT899778 LT899814 (antisense)
T. purgamentosus CBS 113145 KX011504 KX011487 KX011500 MN969189
T. purpureogenus CBS 286.36 = IMI 091926 JN899372 JX315639 KF741947 JX315709
T. qii AS3.15414 = CBS 139515 KP765384 KP765380 KP765382 MN969164
T. rapidus CBS 142382 = UTHSC DI 16-148 LT558970 LT559087 LT795600 LT795601
T. ruber CBS 132704 = DTO 193H6 JX315662 JX315629 KF741938 JX315700
T. rubicundus CBS 342.59 = NRRL 3400 JN899384 JX494309 KF741956 KM023296
T. rufus CBS 141834 = CGMCC 3.13203 MN864272 MN863341 MN863318 MN863331
T. sayulitensis CBS 138204 = DTO 245H1 KJ775713 KJ775206 KJ775422 MH793141
(NRRL 62185)*
T. shilinensis CGMCC 3.20699 OL638159 OL689845 OL689847 OL689849
T. siamensis CBS 475.88 = IMI 323204 JN899385 JX091379 KF741960 KM023279
T. soli NRRL 62165 MH793074 MH792947 MH793011 MH793138
T. sparsus AS3.16003 MT077182 MT083924 MT083925 MT083926
T. stellenboschiensis CBS 135665 = IBT 32631 JX091471 JX091605 JX140683 MN969157
T. stipitatus CBS 375.48 = NRRL 1006 JN899348 KM111288 KF741957 KM023280
T. stollii CBS 408.93 JX315674 JX315633 JX315646 JX315712
T. striatoconidium CBS 550.89 = DTO418-H4 MN431418 MN969441 MN969360 MT156347
T. thailandensis CBS 133147 = KUFC 3399 JX898041 JX494294 KF741940 KM023307
T. tumuli NRRL 6013 MH793071 MH792944 MH793008 MH793135
T. veerkampii CBS 500.78 = IBT 14845 KF741984 KF741918 KF741961 KX961279
T. verruculosus NRRL 1050 = CBS 388.48 KF741994 KF741928 KF741974 KM023306
T. versatilis IMI 134755 = CBS 140377 KC962111 KC992270 MN969319 MN969161
T. virens CGMCC 3.25207 ON563152 ON231297 ON470840 ON470841
T. viridis CBS 114.72 = NRRL 5575 AF285782 JX494310 KF741935 JN121430
T. viridulus CBS 252.87 = FRR 1863 JN899314 JX091385 KF741943 JF417422
T. wushanicus CGMCC 3.20481 MZ356356 MZ361347 MZ361354 MZ361361
T. xishaensis CGMCC 3.17995 KU644580 KU644581 KU644582 MZ361364
T. yunnanensis KUMCC 18-0208 MT152339 MT161683 MT178251 ON703690 (JGT1-103)*
T. zhenhaiensis AS3.16102 MZ045697 MZ054636 MZ054639 MZ054633
T. disparis sp. nov. AS3.26221 T PP544888 PP566271 PP566276 PP555175
T. funiformis sp. nov. AS3.26220 T PP544886 PP566269 PP566274 PP555173
AS3.26225 PP544887 PP566270 PP566275 PP555174
T. jianfengicus sp. nov. AS3.26253 T PP544889 PP566272 PP566277 PP555176
JFL34-5 PP544890 PP566273 PP566278 PP555177
T. assiutensis (outgroup) CBS 147.78 JN899323 KJ865720 KJ885260_ KM023305
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18253/table-1

Note:

The sequences of the ex-types are unavailable in GenBank, those of other strains are used instead. The proposed new species and their strains as well as the GenBank numbers of four genetic markers are in boldface.

In a survey of Talaromyces species in China, we discovered five distinctive Talaromyces strains and propose here three new species represented by them belonging to sect. Talaromyces, namely, T. disparis sp. nov., T. funiformis sp. nov. and T. jianfengicus sp. nov.

Materials and Methods

Isolation of fungi

Talaromyces strains were isolated from soil samples collected from Beijing, Hainan Province and Hebei Province using the method described by Malloch (1981), with dichloran rose Bengal chloramphenicol agar (DRBC) as the isolation medium. Five distinctive Talaromyces strains were isolated and deposited in China General Microbiological Culture Collection (CGMCC) as AS3.26221 (BWL1-2L), AS3.26224 (JXL1-2), AS3.26225 (SJZ2-4), AS3.26220 (BWL1-2), and AS3.26253 (JFL18-1), and one strain, i.e., AS3.26224 (JXL1-2) was identified as T. qii.

Morphological observation

For examination of macro-morphological characters, the culturing media of Czapek agar (Cz), Czapek yeast autolysate agar (CYA), 5% malt extract agar (MEA), yeast extract sucrose agar (YES) and Oatmeal agar (OA), and the incubation temperature and time were used according to Pitt & Hocking (2009), Samson et al. (2010). Color names of Ridgway (1912) were referenced in describing the colors of conidia en masse, mycelium, exudate and/or soluble pigment. For examination of microscopic characters, the procedure described by Xu et al. (2022) was followed.

Phylogenetic analysis

Isolation of genomic DNA was carried out in accordance to the procedure of Scott et al. (2000). Partial BenA, CaM, Rpb2 and ITS sequences were amplified with primers described by Glass & Donaldson (1995), Wang (2012), Jiang et al. (2018) and White et al. (1990), respectively. PCR reagent mixture formulation and reaction parameters were referenced to Zang et al. (2023). Amplicons of the target loci were purified and sequenced, then proofread according to the method described by Xu et al. (2022). The finished sequences without primer sequences were deposited in GenBank (BWL1-2 = AS3.26220: ITS = PP544886, BenA = PP566269, CaM = PP566274, Rpb2 = PP555173; BWL1-2L = AS3.26221: ITS = PP544888, BenA = PP566271, CaM = PP566276, Rpb2 = PP555175; JFL18-1 = AS3.26253: ITS = PP544889, BenA = PP566272, CaM = PP566277, Rpb2 = PP555176; JFL34-5: ITS = PP544890, BenA = PP566273, CaM = PP566278, Rpb2 = PP555177; SJZ2-4 = AS3.26225: ITS = PP544887, BenA = PP566270, CaM = PP566275, Rpb2 = PP555174; JXL1-2 = AS3.26224: ITS = MZ220767, BenA = MZ220770, CaM = MZ220773, Rpb2 = MZ221212).

Among the 90 species in Table 1, 89 species were selected for the phylogenetic analysis of the concatenated BenA-CaM-Rpb2 sequences except T. atkinsoniae whose CaM sequence is unavailable in GenBank. Our six strains and one unidentified strain URM 8665, were included in this BenA-CaM-Rpb2 sequence matrix, thus there were 96 strains in total. Moreover, to confirm the novelty of strains AS3.26253 and JFL34-5, an analysis of BenA-CaM-ITS sequences of 101 strains was carried out including the above 96 strains and one additional strain of T. oumae-annae, one additional strain of T. stellenboschiensis and three additional strains of T. verruculosus (Visagie et al., 2015). In addition, individual analyses of BenA, CaM and ITS sequences of the above 101 strains, and Rpb2 sequences of the above 96 strains were also conducted. In all the analyses, T. assiutensis of sect. Trachyspermi was selected as the outgroup species.

Sequence datasets of the concatenated and individual loci were aligned with MUSCLE implemented in MEGA 6 (Tamura et al., 2013), the alignments were checked and edited to generate sequence matrices, then analyzed with the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method, in which the bootstrap method was used to test the phylogeny for running 1,000 replications. The substitution model and rates among sites were determined by the tool “Find Best DNA/Protein Models (ML)” of MEGA 6, “K2+G+I” is suitable for all the sequence matrices, in which gaps were treated as partial deletion as suggested by Hall (2013).

Nomenclature

The electronic version of this article in Portable Document Format (PDF) will represent a published work according to the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, and hence the new names contained in the electronic version are effectively published under that Code from the electronic edition alone. In addition, new names contained in this work have been submitted to MycoBank from where they will be made available to the Global Names Index. The unique MycoBank number can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the MycoBank number contained in this publication to the prefix “http://www.mycobank.org/MycoTaxo.aspx?Link=T&Rec=”. The online version of this work is archived and available from the following digital repositories: PeerJ, PubMed Central, and CLOCKSS.

Results

Phylogenetic analyses

PCR amplification generated ca. 420, 670, 826 and 560 bp amplicons for BenA, CaM, Rpb2 and ITS, respectively. Matrices of BenA-CaM-Rpb2, BenA-CaM-ITS, BenA, CaM, Rpb2, and ITS sequences consist of 1,277, 1,256, 332, 482, 480 and 442 sites with gaps, respectively. The resulted phylograms from the concatenated and the individual matrices all supported the delineation of three novel species (Fig. 1, Figs. S1S5).

ML phylogram inferred from the concatenated BenA-CaM-Rpb2 sequences showing the three new species in boldface.

Figure 1: ML phylogram inferred from the concatenated BenA-CaM-Rpb2 sequences showing the three new species in boldface.

ML phylogram inferred from the concatenated BenA-CaM-Rpb2 sequences. Bootstrap percentages over 70% derived from 1,000 replicates are indicated at the nodes. New species are indicated in boldface. Bar = 0.05 substitutions per nucleotide position.

Strain AS3.26221 forms a unique clade with no closely related members in either the phylogams based on the BenA-CaM-Rpb2 and BenA-CaM-ITS (Fig. 1, Fig. S1) or those based on individual sequence matrices (Figs. S2S5), thus, the name T. disparis sp. nov. is proposed for it. Although it is in a clade with T. intermedius, T. viridis, T. panamensis in the BenA-CaM-Rpb2 phylogenetic tree, and in a clade with T. panamensis in the BenA-CaM-ITS tree, there is no bootstrap support. In the Rpb2 phylogram, it is basal to the clade consisting of T. aculeatus, T. echinulatus, T. francoae, T. bannicus, T. kendrickii, T. mangshanicus and T. penicillioides (Fig. S4), but there is still no bootstrap support. Strains AS3.26220 and AS3.26225 group in the T. pinophilus complex which includes twelve members, i.e., T. adpressus, T. annesophieae, T. cavernicola, T. domesticus, T. lentulus, T. mae, T. malicola, T. pratensis, T. sayulitensis, T. soli, T. pinophilus and T. tumuli in all the phylograms except the ITS phylogram (note: T. domesticus and T. sayulitensis are not in this complex in BenA-CaM-ITS and CaM phylograms). The two strains in this study form a clade related to T. cavernicola and strain URM 8665 with 74% and 71% bootstrap support in BenA-CaM-Rpb2 and BenA-CaM-ITS phylograms, respectively, but no closely related taxa in BenA, CaM and Rpb2 phylograms. Therefore, they may represent a new species and are named here as T. funiformis sp. nov. (Fig. 1, Figs. S1S4). In the phylogram inferred from BenA-CaM-Rpb2 sequence matrix, strains AS3.26253 and JFL34-5 form one clade in the T. verruculosus complex, closely related to the four members of this complex, i.e., T. johnpittii, T. stellenboschiensis, T. verruculosus, and T. yunnanensis with 100% bootstrap support. Moreover, in the phylograms resulted from BenA-CaM-ITS, BenA, CaM, and Rpb2 sequence matrices with additional T. stellenboschiensis and T. verruculosus strains, they still form the clade closely related to the above four members with 98%, 97%, 86%, 100% bootstrap support, respectively, so these two strains are considered a new species in this complex and are named here as T. jianfengicus sp. nov. In the ITS phylogram, two proposed new taxa, i.e., T. funiformis and T. jianfengicus cannot be discriminated from their close relatives, while T. disparis sp. nov. still forms a solitary clade without any relatives (Fig. S5).

Descriptions of new species (Figs. 24)

Morphological characters of T. disparis sp. nov.

Figure 2: Morphological characters of T. disparis sp. nov.

Morphological characters of T. disparis AS3.26221 T incubated at 25 °C for 7 days. (A–D) Colonies on CYA, MEA, YES and OA. (E–I) Conidiophores. (I) Conidia. Bar = 10 µm.
Morphological characters of T. funiformis sp. nov.

Figure 3: Morphological characters of T. funiformis sp. nov.

Morphological characters of T. funiformis AS3.26220 T incubated at 25 °C for 7 days. (A–D) Colonies on CYA, MEA, YES and OA. (E–G) Conidiophores. (H) Conidia. Bar = 10 µm.
Morphological characters of T. jianfengicus sp. nov.

Figure 4: Morphological characters of T. jianfengicus sp. nov.

Morphological characters of T. jianfengicus AS3.26253 T incubated at 25 °C for 7 days. (A–D) Colonies on CYA, MEA, YES and OA. (E–G) Conidiophores. (H) Conidia. Bar = 10 µm.

Talaromyces disparis Y. Ruan & L. Wang, sp. nov.

MycoBank No: MB 853638

(Fig. 2)

Etymology. The specific epithet refers to its penicilli in different patterns and conidia in different shapes and dimensions.

Holotype. CHINA. HAINAN: Changjiang, Bawang Ridge Nature Reserve, from soil, 19°7′53"N 109°8′2″E, 1,000 m, April 30, 2019, W.-C. Wang BWL1-2L, ex-type culture AS3.26221 (holotype: HMAS 352912, from the dried culture of AS3.26221 on MEA). GenBank: BenA = PP566271, CaM = PP566276, ITS = PP544888, Rpb2 = PP555175.

Diagnosis. This new taxon is characterized by low growth rate, velvety texture, limited to moderate sporulation; biverticillate, monoverticillate and irregular penicilli, and bearing polymorphic smooth-walled conidia with a portion of abnormally large globose ones.

Description

Colonies 10–11 mm diam on CYA at 25 °C after 7 d, low, plane, margins fimbriate; texture velvety; sporulation moderate, conidia en masse Olive-Buff to Dark Olive-Buff (R. Pl. XL); mycelium white; no exudate and soluble pigment; reverse yellowish white. Colonies 13–14 mm diam on MEA at 25 °C after 7 d, slightly deep, with weak concentric plicates, margins regular; texture velvety; sporulation moderate, conidia en masse Light Cress Green (R. Pl. XXXI); mycelium Green-Yellow (R. Pl. V); exudate and soluble pigment absent; reverse Capucine Buff (R. Pl. III). Colonies 12–13 mm diam on YES at 25 °C after 7 d, low, plane; margins fimbriate; texture velvety; sporulation moderate to limited, conidia en masse Light Olive-Gray (R. Pl. LI), mycelium Vinaceous-Fawn to Deep Olive-Buff or Dark Olive-Buff (R. Pl. XL), white at margins; no exudate and soluble pigment; reverse Vinaceous-Rufous (R. Pl. XIV). Colonies 18–20 mm diam on OA at 25 °C after 7 d, sparse, low, plane, margins regular; texture velvety; sporulation limited in centres, conidia en masse Cress Green (R. Pl. XXXI); mycelium Naphthalene Yellow (R. Pl. XVI) in central areas while white elsewhere; exudate absent or limited, clear; no soluble pigment; reverse yellowish white. Colonies 11–12 mm diam on Cz at 25 °C after 7 d, low, plane, sparse, margins regular; texture velvety; sporulation absent; mycelium Sulphur Yellow (R. Pl. V); no exudate and soluble pigment; reverse yellowish white. On CYA at 37 °C after 7 d, no growth.

Conidiophores rising from surface hyphae; stipes 60–80 (–120) × 3–3.5 μm; penicilli biverticillate, monoverticillate and irregular; metulae (3–) 6–8 per vertical, 10–12 × 3–4 μm; phialides (3–) 4–6 per verticil, ampuliform, 10–12 (–14) × 3–4 μm; conidia ovoid, globose to lemon-shaped, 4–4.5 × 3.5–4 μm, abnormally large globose ones about 5–6 μm, walls thick and smooth, some with connectives at both ends.

Talaromyces funiformis Y. Ruan & L. Wang, sp. nov.

MycoBank No. MB 853639

(Fig. 3)

Etymology. The specific epithet refers to the funiculose appearance on CYA, MEA and YES.

Holotype. CHINA. HAINAN: Changjiang, Bawang Ridge Nature Reserve, from soil, 19°7′53″N 109°8′2″E, 1,000 m, April 30, 2019, W.-C. Wang BWL1-2, ex-type culture AS3.26220 (holotype: HMAS 352911, from the dried culture of AS3.26220 on MEA). GenBank: BenA = MZ220770, CaM = MZ220773, ITS = MZ220767, Rpb2 = MZ221212.

Diagnosis. This new taxon is characterized by producing mycelial funicles on CYA, MEA and YES, sparse sporulation on Cz, CYA, MEA and YES while abundant on OA, low growth rate at 37 °C; appressed biverticillate penicilli and globose to pyriform conida with smooth to finely rough walls.

Description

Colonies 26–28 mm diam on CYA at 25 °C after 7 d, low, plane, margins fimbriate; texture velvety and sparsely funiculose and floccose; sporulation sparse, conidia en masse light Pea Green (R. Pl. XLVII); mycelium Pale Vinaceous-Fawn (R. Pl. XL) in central areas and Light Greenish Yellow (R. Pl. V) at margins; no exudate and soluble pigment; reverse Xanthine Orange (R. Pl. III) in central areas, fading into Pale Orange-Yellow (R. Pl. III) at marginal areas. Colonies 38–40 mm diam on MEA at 25 °C after 7 d, slightly deep, plane, margins regular; texture velvety and densely funiculose and floccose; sporulation moderate to sparse, conidia en masse Pea Green (R. Pl. XLVII); mycelium Light Greenish Yellow (R. Pl. V); exudate and soluble pigment absent; reverse Mars Orange to Orange Rufous (R. Pl. II). Colonies 30–32 mm diam on YES at 25 °C after 7 d, low, irregularly sulcate; margins fimbriate; texture velvety and sparsely funiculose and floccose; sporulation sparse, conidia en masse Olive-Gray (R. Pl. LI); mycelium Pale Salmon Color (R. Pl. XIV) in central areas while Pale Yellow-Orange (R. Pl. III) at margins; exudate limited, brown; no soluble pigment; reverse Xanthine Orange (R. Pl. III), fading into Pale Orange Yellow (R. Pl. III) at marginal areas. Colonies 35–37 mm diam on OA at 25 °C after 7 d, low, plane, margins fimbriate; texture velvety; sporulation abundant, conidia en masse Olive-Gray (R. Pl. LI); mycelium pale yellow; exudate absent or limited, clear; no soluble pigment; reverse Cinnamon Rufous (R. Pl. XIV), fading into light yellow at marginal areas. Colonies 12–14 mm diam on Cz at 25 °C after 7 d, low, plane, margins fimbriate; texture velvety; sporulation sparse, limited in centres, conidia en masse Deep Grayish Olive (R. Pl. XLVI); mycelium white mingled with Pale Flesh Color (R. Pl. XIV); no exudate and soluble pigment; reverse Salmon Buff (R. Pl. XIV). Colonies 10–12 mm diam on CYA at 37 °C, deep, margins regular; texture densely floccose; no sporulation; mycelium white; no exudate and soluble pigment; reverse Salmon Buff to Cinnamon-Buff (R. Pl. XIV).

Conidiophores rising from mycelial funicles; stipes 150–300 × 2.5–3.5 μm, smooth-walled; penicilli biverticillate, appressed; metulae 6–8 per vertical, 10–13 × 2–2.5 μm; phialides 6–8 per verticil, acerose, 10–12 × 2–2.5 μm; conidia globose to pyriform, 2–2.5 μm, walls smooth to finely rough.

Additional strains: CHINA, HEIBEI: Shijiazhuang, Daguo Village, from farm soil, 38°5′9″N 114°25′18″E, 70 m, August 20, 2020, S.-Z. Wei SJZ2-4 = AS3.26225. GenBank: BenA = PP566270, CaM = PP566275, ITS = PP544887, Rpb2 = PP555174.

Talaromyces jianfengicus Y. Ruan & L. Wang, sp. nov.

MycoBank No. MB 853553

(Fig. 4)

Etymology. The specific epithet refers to the locale where the ex-type strain was isolated.

Holotype. CHINA: HAINAN: Ledong, Jianfeng Ridge Nature Reserve, from soil, 18°42′14″N 108°49′33″E, 600 m, April 21, 2019, W.-C. Wang JFJ18-1, ex-type culture AS3.26253 (holotype: HMAS 352913, from the dried culture on MEA). GenBank: BenA = PP566272, CaM = PP566277, ITS = PP544889, Rpb2 = PP555176.

Diagnosis. This new taxon is characterized by velvety colony texture with moderate to abundant elm-green conidia en masse and green-yellow mycelium, biverticillate penicilli, ampuliform phialides and globose conidia with verrucose walls.

Description

Colonies 18–19 mm diam on CYA at 25 °C after 7 d, low, plane, margins fimbriate; texture velvety; sporulation moderate, conidia en masse Light Elm Green (R. Pl. XVII); mycelium Chalcedony Yellow (R. Pl. XVII), white at margins; no exudate and soluble pigment; reverse Pale Orange-Yellow (R. Pl. III). Colonies 29–31 mm diam on MEA at 25 °C after 7 d, low, plane, margins regular; texture velvety; sporulation abundant, conidia en masse Elm Green (R. Pl. XVII); mycelium Chalcedony Yellow (R. Pl. XVII), white at margins; no exudate and soluble pigment; reverse Warm buff (R. Pl. XV). Colonies 34–35 mm diam on YES at 25 °C after 7 d, low, convolute centrally, irregularly sulcate densely; margins regular; texture velvety; sporulation abundant, conidia en masse Yew Green (R. Pl. XXXI); mycelium Pale Greenish Yellow R. Pl. V), white at margins; no exudate and soluble pigment; reverse Ochraceous-Salmon to Warm Buff (R. Pl. XV). Colonies 38–40 mm diam on OA at 25 °C after 7 d, low, plane, margins wide, regular; texture velvety; sporulation abundant, conidia en masse Cerro Green (R. Pl. V); mycelium Pale Viridine Yellow (R. Pl. V), white at margins; exudate limited, clear; no soluble pigment; reverse Chalcedony Yellow (R. Pl. XVII). Colonies 16–18 mm diam on Cz at 25 °C after 7 d, low, plane, margins wide, regular; texture velvety; sporulation limited to moderate, conidia en masse Elm Green (R. Pl. XVII); mycelium Chalcedony Yellow (R. Pl. XVII), white at margins; no exudate and soluble pigment; reverse Capucine Buff (R. Pl. III). Colonies 6–7 mm diam on CYA at 37 °C, deep, margins regular; texture velvety; no sporulation; mycelium white; no exudate and soluble pigment; reverse Pinkish Cinnamon (R. Pl. XXIX).

Conidiophores rising from surface and aerial hyphae; stipes 150–200 × 2.5–3 μm when from surface hyphae, and 10–50 μm long when from aerial hyphae, smooth-walled; penicilli biverticillate; metulae 8–10 per stipe, 8–10 × 3.5–4 μm; phialides 6–8 per metula, ampuliform, 10–12 × 3.5–4 μm; conidia globose, 4–5 μm, walls verrucose.

Additional strains: CHINA: HAINAN: Ledong, Jiangfeng Ridge Nature Reserve, from soil, 18°42′14″N 108°49′33″E, 600 m, April 21, 2019, W.-C. Wang JFJ34-5, GenBank: BenA = PP566273, CaM = PP566278, ITS = PP544889, Rpb2 = PP555176.

Discussion

Sect. Talaromyces is the largest section in Talaromyces, including species that commonly grow fast, produce spreading velvelty to floccose colonies more than 30 mm diam. on MEA, and their penicilli are typically biverticillate, though some produce a portion of monoverticillate, terverticillate (with subterminal branches) or irregular penicilli. Some members of this section grow slowly, e.g., T. bannicus, T. mangshanicus and T. marneffei, or form colonies with synnemata or funicles, such as, T. calidicanius, T. duclauxii, T. funiculosus, T. pinophilus, T. pseudostromaticus, but biverticillate penicilli are usually produced, irrespective of whether their phialides are acerose or ampuliform. Phylogenetically, species in this section are usually distantly related, but some closely related taxa compose species complexes, for instance, T. pinophilus complex includes twelve members, i.e., T. cavernicola, T. pratensis, T. lentulus, T. adpressus, T. tumuli, T. soli, T. malicola, T. pinophilus, T. mae, T. domesticus, T. sayulitensis, T. annesophieae; T. verruculosus complex contains four members, namely, T. johnpittii, T. stellenboschiensis, T. yunnanensis, T. verruculosus; T. liani complex consists of T. nanjingensis, T. liani, T. brevis; T. veerkampii complex is comprised of T. californicus, T. louisianensis, T. veerkampii; and T. funiculosus complex comprises T. cucurbitiradicus, T. funiculosus, T. pseudofuniculosus (e.g., Fig. 1). Members of these species complexes are not easily discriminated from each other by using morphology, especially micro-morphology.

Using the polyphasic taxonomy that integrates morphological and phylogenetic characters, we established a new species based on one single strain, since it is phylogenetically distinctive and its morphological characters are obviously distinguishable from other species. T. disparis is a unique taxon that has no close relatives in Talaromyces based on the phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1, Figs. S1S5). Though it is in a clade with T. intermedius, T. viridis and T. panamensis in BenA-CaM-Rpb2 phylogram, no bootstrap support is presented. In morphological characters, it is distinctive in low growth rate at 25 °C (CYA: 10–11 mm, MEA: 13–14 mm, YES: 12–13 mm, Cz: 11–12 mm), produces polymorphic conidiophores with biverticillate, monoverticillate and irregular penicilli, bears polymorphic conidia that are ovoid, globose to lemon-shaped commonly measured 4–4.5 × 3.5–4 μm, while with abnormally large globose ones about 5–6 μm. There are few species in sect. Talaromyces that grow slowly on conventional culturing media at 25 °C, such as T. bannicus, T. mangshanicus and T. viridis (Yilmaz et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2017; Wei, Xu & Wang, 2021). T. viridis is readily distinguished from T. disparis by producing ascomata and abnormal anamorphs with solitary phialides and fusiform to ellipsoidal conidia. Besides the restricted growth, T. bannicus and T. mangshanicus both produce biverticillate, monoverticillate and irregular conidiophores with ampuliform phialides similar to those of T. disparis. The definitive difference between T. disparis and T. mangshanicus is that the conidia of the latter are subglobose to ellipsoidal with echinulate walls, obviously different from those of the new species, which are polymorphic with smooth walls. T. bannicus also bears polymorphic conidia with abnormally large ones similar to those of the new species, but their shapes are commonly pyriform to ellipsoidal with walls conspicuously echinulate to verrucose. In all the phylograms, the new species is distantly separated from T. bannicus and T. mangshanicus (Fig. 1, Figs. S1S5).

Talaromyces funiformis belongs to the T. pinophilus complex. There are now thirteen members in this species complex, which commonly show floccose and funiculose colony appearance, grow well at 37 °C (except T. annesophieae which does not grow), and produce compact penicilli bearing acerose phialides and globose, subglobose to broadly ellipsoidal conidia with smooth to finely rough walls (Visagie et al., 2014; Crous et al., 2017; Jiang et al., 2018; Peterson & Jurjević, 2019; Alves et al., 2022). In the phylograms based on BenA-CaM-Rpb2 and BenA-CaM-ITS, T. funiformis is weakly related to T. cavernicola and the unidentified strain URM8665 with 74% and 71% bootstrap support, respectively. But according to the analyses based on individual loci, except that the ITS region is unable to distinguish between T. funiformis and T. cavernicola, the BenA, CaM, and Rpb2 phylograms all show that they are unrelated. Also morphologically, the floccose and funiculose colony texture, light greenish yellow mycelium and sparse sporulation on CYA, MEA, YES and Cz show similarity to T. cavernicola, but T. funiformis can be discriminated from T. cavernicola by growing more slowly on CYA, YES and Cz at 25 °C (CYA: 26–28 mm vs. 31–35 mm, YES: 30–32 mm vs. 40–47 mm, Cz: 12–14 mm vs. 18–19 mm) and on CYA at 37 °C (10–12 mm vs. 34–38 mm), while much faster on OA at 25 °C (35–37 mm vs. 24–28 mm diam). Moreover, it shows velvety colony texture and abundant sporulation on OA, where T. cavernicola shows floccose texture with poor sporulation. The low growth rate at 37 °C on CYA (10–12 mm) and velvety texture with abundant sporulation on OA of T. funiformis can be used to distinguish it from the other members in this complex, which commonly grow moderately to fast at 37 °C and show floccose and funiculose texture on OA, e.g., T. pinophilus (24–40 mm), T. domesticus (30–38 mm), T. pratensis (25–30 mm), T. soli (23–28 mm), T. tumuli (21–35 mm), T. adpressus (35–38 mm), T. sayulitensis (32–40 mm), T. lentulus (18–21 mm), T. mae (17–18 mm). The only exception is T. malicola which grows slowly at 37 °C on CYA (9–10 mm) similar to T. funiformis (10–12 mm), but the floccose and funiculose texture on OA and low growth rate on MEA (29–31 mm vs. 38–40 mm) of T. malicola still can be relied on to distinguish it from the new species.

The last new species, T. jianfengicus belongs to T. verruculosus complex including T. johnpittii, T. stellenboschiensis, T. yunnanensis and T. verruculosus. These members commonly grow moderately to fast on MEA, YES and OA (note: uncertain in T. johnpittii whose data are unavailable), produce green-yellow mycelium on CYA, MEA and YES, and moderate to abundant conidia in dark green (elm green) and color en masse on MEA, their penicilli usually broadly biverticillate with amuliform phialides bearing globose conidia with echinulate to verrucose walls. The new species produces similar colony appearance, and conidiophores and conidia in shape and dimension to those of T. stellenboschiensis, T. yunnanensis and T. verruculosus, but it still can be discriminated from them by much slow growth at 25 °C on CYA (18–19 mm vs. 40–45 mm, 35–37 mm, 32–35 mm, respectively) and MEA (29–31 mm vs. 40–42 mm, 50–53 mm, 35–36 mm, respectively), and further distinguished from T. stellenboschiensis and T. verruculosus by restricted growth at 37 °C on CYA (6–7 mm vs. 35–40 mm, 25–26 mm, respectively). There are no growth data on CYA, MEA, YES and OA for T. johnpittii, but the new species and T. johnpittii are obviously different in penicilli, for example, the new species produces more numerous metulae and phialides than T. johnpittii (metulae: 8–10 vs. 2–5, phialides: 6–8 vs. 2–5), and the phialide collulae of T. johnpittii are distinctive in showing periclinal thickened collarettes, while those of the new species are conoidal, which is conventional in Talaromyces (Yilmaz et al., 2014; Visagie et al., 2015; Doilom et al., 2020; Lacey et al., 2023).

It is noteworthy that some species in sect. Talaromyces are opportunistic pathogens for humans and animals. T. marneffei is the only thermally dimorphic species in Talaromyces, causing invasive talaromycosis in immunocompromised patients. It is believed that the infection begins with the inhalation of conidia. However, it is puzzling how this fungus produces enough conidia to reach a threshold density for infection in natural habitats, such as soil, since the growth of T. marneffei on artificial culturing media is very slow and the sporulation is sparse. After inhaled, the infectious conidia are primarily engulfed by alveolar macrophages where they germinate to form yeast cells due to 37 °C and the intracellular environment of macrophages. These yeast cells reprogram metabolism pathways to adapt nutrient limitation and synthesize various kinds of virulence factors to survive the stress in macrophages, for example, heat shock protein (HSP), catalase-peroxidase, superoxide dismutase (SOD), melanin and mannoproteins, etc. Some of these proteins, such as HSP, melanin and mannoproteins are included in extracellular vesicles (EVs) secreted into the cytoplasm of macrophage, which stimulate macrophages to produce various inflammatory factors with antimicrobial activity. On the other hand, macrophages may shelter the pathogen from the fungicidal activity of neutrophils (Ellett et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2021; Pruksaphon et al., 2022, 2023; Wang, Han & Chen, 2023). Thus, the pathogenic mechanism of T. marneffei still remains not fully understood.

Many other species in this section were reported to cause talaromycosis, for instance, T. alveolaris, T. amestolkiae, T. aurantiacus, T. cnidii, T. funiculosus, T. indigoticus, T. kabodanensis, T. pinophilus, T. purpureogenus, T. rapidus, T. ruber, T. stipitatus, and T. stollii (Yilmaz et al., 2014; Guevara-Suarez et al., 2016, 2017; Guo et al., 2021; Bacon et al., 2022; Sharma & Nonzom, 2022), whereas, some of these species may be misidentified or in doubt. For example, isolate DI16-138 was identified as “T. cnidii” by Guevara-Suarez et al. (2016), but using its BenA sequence (LT559077) as the query to BLASTn with “sequences from type material”, we found no T. cnidii sequences in the result, and there are nine nucleotides different from that of the ex-type strain of T. cnidii KACC 46617 (KF183641). Guo et al. (2021) identified an isolate PUMCH_Q056 from clinical specimens as “T. aurantiacus”, but the BenA (MW148866) and Rpb2 (MW122767) sequences of the isolate cannot confirm the identification, in addition, according to Bacon et al. (2022), “T. aurantiacus” was isolated from the central nervous system of a Labrador retriever but the ITS sequence (MZ338025) represents Penicillium canescens in GenBank. Sharma & Nonzom (2022) reported T. stipitatus causing superficial mycosis in India, but based on the ITS sequence (MT994164) of their isolate BHS I, it is supposed to be T. zhenhaiensis (ITS= MZ045697).

Irrespective of those pathogenic members, many species in sect. Talaromyces are potent lignocellulolytic enzyme producers and some species have played an important role in the research and application of degrading vegetal biomass that contains cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin and pectin. Though Trichoderma reesei has been the dominant fungus in studies and industries of ignocellulolytic enzymes, its genome harbors fewer genes encoding cellulase, hemicellulase, especially β-glucosidase than certain Talaromyces species do (Martinez et al., 2008). For example, as the first Talaromyces species utilized in degrading lignocellulosic biomass, T. pinophilus (as “T. cellulolyticus”) presents higher glucan-hydrolyzing and xylan-hydrolyzing activity in its cellulase mixture than Trichoderma reesei does (Fujii et al., 2009), and the genome of T. pinophilus has much more cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic enzyme genes compared with other cellulase-producing fungi (Li et al., 2017). T. funiculosus is also proved to be a good producer for cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic enzymes with more β-glucosidases than Trichoderma reesei produces (Ogunmolu et al., 2015; Pasari et al., 2023). Studies of Goyari et al. (2015) shows that T. verrucullosus secretes efficient β-glucosidase, endoglucanase and cellobiohydrolase on natural cellulose substances with continuous activity without end product inhibition due to sufficient β-glucosidase. Studies of de Eugenio et al. (2017) and Prieto et al. (2021) showed that the genome of T. amestolkiae encodes more cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic enzymes than that of Trichoderma reesei, and the endoxylanase, β-xylosidase, particularly β-glucosidase produced by T. amestolkiae would be good candidates for lignocellulolytic enzyme cocktails. In industries, for example, the endo-1, 3(4)-beta-glucanase and endo-1, 4-beta-xylanase from T. versatilis have been the feed additive for many kinds of domestic animals (e.g., Llanos et al., 2019). All these facts indicate that species in sect. Talaromyces are promising candidates in enzyme industries for plant biomass degradation.

Besides producing lignocellulolytic enzymes, species of sect. Talaromyces are robust producers of secondary metabolites, such as terpenoids, steroids, alkaloids, polyketides, etc. Compared with other sections in Talaromyces, species of this section account for the vast majority in producing various secondary metabolites. According to Nicoletti, Bellavita & Falanga (2023), eleven species from marine environment, namely, T. aculeatus, T. amestolkiae, T. flavus, T. funiculosus, T. mangshanicus, T. pinophilus, T. purpureogenus, T. stipitatus, T. stollii, T. verruculosus, T. versatilis, are the popular producers for new secondary metabolites as well as those shared by other organisms, a large portion of these compounds have antibacterial, anti-proliferative, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities, but many aspects of their biotechnological implications remain unexplored.

Conclusions

Talaromyces species are valuable fungal resource either in research work or industrial application, and the species diversity of this genus still needs much investigation. Though the application of environmental metabarcoding technique is widely used in studies on fungal diversity, isolation of pure cultures, discovering and preserving new species are still the prerequisite for in-depth research and exploitation of these biological resources. In this study, we used the serial dilution method in the isolation of fungi and a polyphasic taxonomic approach integrating the morphological and molecular phylogenetic methods in the discovery and proposal of three Talaromyces new species. As the third-generation sequencing technology developed, numerous fungal genomes have been sequenced and assembled in high quality, but much expert bioinformatic analysis still needs to be conducted, which may provide clues for understanding how these fungi survive in natural habitats, pathways of producing lignocellulolytic enzymes and secondary metabolites, as well as the pathogenicity of those opportunistic pathogens.

Supplemental Information

The sequence matrices analyzed in this study.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18253/supp-1

ML phylogram inferred from the concatenated BenA-CaM-ITS sequences showing the three new species in boldface.

Bootstrap percentages over 70% derived from 1000 replicates are indicated at the nodes. New species are indicated in boldface. Bar = 0.05 substitutions per nucleotide position.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18253/supp-2

ML phylogram inferred from partial BenA sequences showing the three new species in boldface.

Bootstrap percentages over 70% derived from 1000 replicates are indicated at the nodes. New species are indicated in boldface. Bar = 0.05 substitutions per nucleotide position.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18253/supp-3

ML phylogram inferred from partial CaM sequences showing the three new species in boldface.

Bootstrap percentages over 70% derived from 1000 replicates are indicated at the nodes. New species are indicated in boldface. Bar = 0.05 substitutions per nucleotide position.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18253/supp-4

ML phylogram inferred from partial Rpb2 sequences showing the three new species in boldface.

Bootstrap percentages over 70% derived from 1000 replicates are indicated at the nodes. New species are indicated in boldface. Bar = 0.05 substitutions per nucleotide position.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18253/supp-5

ML phylogram inferred from partial ITS sequences showing the three new species in boldface.

Bootstrap percentages over 70% derived from 1000 replicates are indicated at the nodes. New species are indicated in boldface. Bar = 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18253/supp-6
3 Citations   Views   Downloads