Genome-wide analysis of the WRKY genes and their important roles during cold stress in white clover

View article
Bioinformatics and Genomics

Introduction

During the life cycle of plants on Earth, they often encounter various stresses, seriously hindering their growth and development (Chinnusamy, Schumaker & Zhu, 2004; Katagiri, 2004). Among these stresses, most of them are abiotic stresses, such as drought, salt, and cold, etc. In long-term evolution, plants have gradually developed numerous molecular regulatory mechanisms to confer various stresses. These regulatory mechanisms have employed many genes involved in complex regulatory processes, which adjust plants’ physiological and biochemical processes in adapting to adverse environments. Among these genes, transcription factors (TF) are richly distributed in plants, which play very important roles in response to stress (Singh, Foley & Onate-Sanchez, 2002; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki & Shinozaki, 2006). The TF genes can bind to DNA regions, which are named as cis-acting elements, and regulate downstream gene expression. According to kinds of DNA regions, TF genes are divided into many classes, such as AP2/ERF, bZIP, WRKY, MYB, bHLH, etc., (Singh, Foley & Onate-Sanchez, 2002).

The WRKY gene family is a transcription factor family that has been specifically and widely identified in plants, mainly in higher plants, but rarely in lower organisms (Eulgem et al., 2000). These WRKY TFs can bind to cis-acting element (named as W-box, (T)(T)TGAC(C/T)), and regulate expression of downstream target genes containing W-box in promotors. These genes are characterized with critical roles in response to biotic, abiotic, and hormonal signaling processes (Ülker & Somssich, 2004). The WRKY gene was first isolated from sweet potato and named Sweet Potato Factor 1 (SPF1) (Ishiguro & Nakamura, 1994), it has since been widely identified and characterized from a lot of plants, and has become one of the largest TF families in plants, such as 72 WRKY TFs in Arabidopsis thaliana and 102 WRKY members in rice (Oryza sativa) (Abdullah-Zawawi et al., 2021). With the development of genome sequencing projects, many WRKY TFs have been well identified in dozens of plants with completed genome sequencing, such as cucumber (Cucumis sativus L) (Chen et al., 2020b), poplar (Populus tremula), grape (Vitis vinifera) (Wang et al., 2014), alfalfa (Medicago sativa L) (Mao et al., 2020), tea tree (Camellia sinensis), etc., (Chen et al., 2015, 2016; Rinerson et al., 2015; Singh et al., 2019; Xie et al., 2018). The roles of WRKY TFs have been widely documented in regulating plant growth, development process, and especially in response to abiotic stresses (Li et al., 2020). Yoo et al. (2014) have found that multiple WRKY genes could modulate response to abiotic stress, while over-expression of OsWRKY genes would enhance its tolerance to abiotic stress, and many WRKY TFs have also been characterized with a high capability to improve abiotic stress tolerance in various plants (Ülker & Somssich, 2004).

White clover (Trifolium repens L) is a perennial legume plant which is widely distributed in temperate and cool-temperate regions due to its strong root development, prostrate growth, and rapid regeneration (Wu et al., 2021). It also has a high yield, good quality, and adaptability, making it an important economic crop and an ideal forage for reforestation and improvement of natural grassland in some regions, which is also widely used as a landscape plant in gardens. However, during its growth process, white clover inevitably encounters various abiotic stresses, such as high salt, drought, and cold stress, especially in hard-winter of high-latitude regions, which causes extremely abnormal death of white clover and severely affects their production and promotion. Therefore, improving the cold tolerance of white clover has become an incisive problem in white clover production, while its genetic knowledge is still poor (Bao et al., 2020; Inostroza et al., 2018). Until 2019, the genome sequences of white clover were released, and researchers have been able to investigate gene function at the genome-level, which greatly promoted genetic improvement works in white clover (Griffiths et al., 2019). For example, Ma et al. (2022) have identified 37 SPL transcription factors from the white clover genome and characterized their key functions in inflorescence development.

Based on these results, our study has used bioinformatics methods to identify WRKY TFs from white clover at the genome-wide level, and systematically characterized their structure constitutions, cis-acting elements analysis, chromosome distributions, and genetic regulation network by integrating various datasets. Furthermore, RNA-seq was adopted to investigate WRKY TFs in response to cold stress, and qRT-PCR also confirmed their expression profiles. These findings would provide valuable insights into the exploration of white clover WRKY functions in response to cold stress.

Materials and Methods

Identification and classification of the TrWRKY gene family in white clover

The white clover genome resource information was released from the previous study, and all files were provided by Stig Uggerhøj Andersen from Aarhus University (Griffiths et al., 2019). DNA, CDS, and protein sequences were retrieved from the white clover genome. The sequences of Arabidopsis WRKY family proteins were collected from the TAIR database and used as BLAST (version 2.9.0+) query sequences to search the genome of white clover (Altschul et al., 1997), with an evaluation setting of 1E-05 and the coverages were set as 80%. The HMM file (version 3.3) (PF03106) was downloaded from the Pfam database (Punta et al., 2011), and the HMMER (evalue: 0.01) was used to identify and confirm WRKY DNA-binding domain, which was characterized as candidate WRKY proteins (Finn, Clements & Eddy, 2011). Annotated information for all candidate WRKY genes was retrieved from the white clover genome, including genome position, protein length, intron numbers, and these WRKY genes were classified into groups based on similar WRKY genes in Arabidopsis.

Phylogenetic analysis of the TrWRKY genes in white clover

Multiple sequence alignment analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana and white clover WRKY proteins using MUSCLE (version 5.1.0) with default parameters (Edgar, 2004). The phylogenetic tree of the WRKY gene family was constructed using the MEGA (version 11; Tamura, Stecher & Kumar, 2021) method with the following parameters: (1) Neighbor-joining (NJ); (2) Poisson correction; (3) genetic distance; (4) pair-wise deletion; (5) bootstrap: 1,000 replications. The TrWRKY genes were classified into different groups and subgroups based on the phylogenetic tree of AtWRKY and TrWRKY sequences.

Motif composition distribution analysis of TrWRKY genes in white clover

The conserved motifs of white clover WRKY protein sequences were identified using MEME (Multiple EM for motif Elicitation, Version 4.8.1) with the following parameters: (1) minimum and maximum width: 10 and 50, respectively; (2) the maximum number of motifs, 10; (3) number of appearances of a single pattern distributed in the sequences with model: 0 or 1 per sequence (-modzoops) (Bailey et al., 2009). All results were displayed with TBtools (version 1.098; Chen et al., 2020a).

Cis-acting elements analysis in the promoters of members of the TrWRKYs gene family

The 1,000 bp genomic sequence upstream of the transcription start site of the WRKYs gene family members was obtained from the white clover genome and the cis-acting elements in the promoter region of TrWRKYs gene family members were predicted by the PlantCARE online tool (https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/).

Chromosomal location, gene duplication and Ka/Ks analysis of WRKY genes in white clover

All white clover proteins were compared to each other using the software BLASTP (version 2.9.0+), and the gene duplications were identified and characterized based on BLAST results by software MCSanX (version Python) with the default parameter (Wang et al., 2012). Based on the positional information of WRKY genes in the white clover genome and the duplication between genes, the software CIRCOS (version 0.69-8) was used to display the distribution of the WRKY gene family in the white clover genome (Krzywinski et al., 2009). Based on the phylogenetic tree and gene duplications results, a molecular evolutionary analysis of the TrWRKY genes was performed by calculating the nonsynonymous (Ka) to synonymous (Ks) substitution ratio of the duplicated gene pairs in S. tuberosum using the KaKs_Calculator in TBtools (Chen et al., 2020a).

Gene regulation network analysis of white clover WRKY gene family

The information on the Arabidopsis gene regulatory network (GRN) was extracted from the AraNet database (V2) (Lee et al., 2014), including 22,894 Arabidopsis genes and 895,000 interactions (links). All white clover proteins were subjected to BLAST searched with Arabidopsis proteins, with an e-value cut-off 1e-05, and the highest scoring hits were confirmed as homologous genes of the white clover gene. Meanwhile, all Arabidopsis proteins were also BLAST searched against white clover proteins with the same set, and hits with the highest scores were identified as homologous genes for Arabidopsis genes; the two genes were identified as homologous pairs with two BLAST results. Then, the GRN of white clover was constructed using the GRN of Arabidopsis based on homologous pairs. The sub-networks that contained the TrWRKY gene of white clover were searched and evaluated; the results were visualized using Cytoscape software (version 3.9.1), as well as the genes were annotated using GO information based on white clover genome annotation information (Shannon et al., 2003). Then, GO enrichment analysis of the sub-networks was performed using topGO software (version 2.50.0; Alexa & Rahnenfuhrer, 2019), the threshold level was set to 0.05 to show the most significant terms, and terms with high enrichment were assigned as GRN functions as described in the software protocol.

Expression analysis of white clover TrWRKY genes in response to cold stress

The RNA-seq data have been reported, the data included eight time points in response to cold stress; our previous work has described in detail, which could be assessed with accession numbers: PRJNA781064 (Zhang et al., 2022). All of the RNA-seq reads were mapped to the transcript sequences of white clover genomes using the Salmon software (version 0.12.0), and the expression level of each gene (FPKM value) was estimated using the subroutine quant of software Salmon (Patro et al., 2017). These expressional data were transformed using the “log2” function and they were centered using the “scale” function of the R program (version 4.2.1; R Core Team, 2022); then, all expression data were clustered and plotted using the “heatmap.2” function of the ggplots package (version 3.1.3).

Plant growth and qRT-PCR analysis

Seeds of white clover cv. Haifa were purchased from Barenbrug China Ltd. Com. (Beijing, China). All seeds were germinated and transferred to a mixture of perlite and sand each with a volume of 3:1, as our previously described (Zhang et al., 2022). In briefly, all seeds were growing in the pots, about 10–15 plants per pot. The growth temperature was 24 °C in light and 18 °C in darkness per day and irrigated with half-strength Hoagland solution once every 2 days. After 4 weeks, they were randomly divided into four groups for cold stress treatment. We collected at 0 min (control), 30 min, 1 h, and 3 h (4 time points in total) at a setting of 4 °C. For each group, three samples were randomly chosen of five seedlings were pooled to form a biological replicate. All samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. Total RNA was extracted from white clover seedlings at different time points of cold stress at 4 °C using the Total Plant RNA Extraction Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China), divided into four time points (0 min (control), 30 min, 1 h, 3 h), and used Prime Script RT kit (Toyobo, Shanghai, China) was reverse transcribed into cDNA as a template for quantitative reverse transcription PCR. Primers were designed using Primer3 based on the nucleotide sequences of WRKY family genes (Table S1) (Untergasser et al., 2012). qRT-PCR was performed using a Light Cycler® 96 system (Roche, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) and SYBR Premix Ex TaqTMII (Toyobo, Shanghai, China). Three replicates of each experiment were performed. The PCR conditions were set as follows. 95 °C for 2 min, 40 cycles, 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min. Fold change values were calculated using expression abundance, which is based on the 2−ΔΔCT method.

Results and analysis

Identification of WRKY genes in white clover

A total of 145 TrWRKY genes were successfully identified from the white clover genome by multiple sequence alignment based on the amino acid sequence of the white clover WRKY gene family. These genes were proven to contain WRKY domains according to domain analysis and they were named TrWRKY1 to TrWRKY145 according to their chromosome locus and structure. All genomic information of these TrWRKY genes, including names, gene locus, chromosomal locations, group, introns and protein length (aa) were retrieved and summarized in Table 1. For these 145 TrWRKY genes, the largest protein was TrWRKY145, comprising 1,063 amino acids (aa), while the smallest one was TrWRKY65 (137aa). There are 16 chromosomes in the white clover genome; the TrWRKY genes were not evenly distributed across all chromosomes. The intron distribution was 1—11, of which the TrWRKY121 had the most introns (11 introns), while fifteen members contained only one intron; the results showed TrWRKY genes highly diverged.

Table 1:
Summary of TrWRKY genes identified in the white clover.
Name Locus Chromosomal locations Group Intron Length (aa)
TrWRKY001 chr1.jg4946 Tr1O:35253397–35255542 I 4 155
TrWRKY002 chr5.jg5422 Tr5O:36224162–36225107 I 1 195
TrWRKY003 chr1.jg4948 Tr1O:35276740–35279067 I 2 206
TrWRKY004 chr5.jg4677 Tr5O:31183372–31185712 I 3 290
TrWRKY005 chr7.jg5842 Tr7O:36085774–36087462 I 2 340
TrWRKY006 chr12.jg3166 Tr4P:21046044–21048271 I 3 378
TrWRKY007 chr2.jg5856 Tr2O:39405643–39408558 I 3 379
TrWRKY008 chr3.jg9578 Tr3O:62913893–62916736 I 3 425
TrWRKY009 chr15.jg2764 Tr7P:18230475–18233187 I 4 436
TrWRKY010 chr9.jg5404 Tr1P:36641010–36643525 I 4 441
TrWRKY011 chr4.jg377 Tr4O:2750219–2753428 I 4 462
TrWRKY012 chr4.jg517 Tr4O:3682810–3686140 I 4 462
TrWRKY013 chr13.jg5881 Tr5P:38784060–38785660 I 2 470
TrWRKY014 chr9.jg4026 Tr1P:27139671–27144775 I 4 487
TrWRKY015 chr16.jg6482 Tr8P:46034663–46039091 I 4 493
TrWRKY016 chr3.jg1725 Tr3O:11498359–11502499 I 4 507
TrWRKY017 chr3.jg810 Tr3O:5276114–5280219 I 4 511
TrWRKY018 chr7.jg4527 Tr7O:28275075–28279600 I 3 517
TrWRKY019 chr16.jg6484 Tr8P:46056816–46061810 I 5 522
TrWRKY020 chr13.jg5948 Tr5P:39165179–39168802 I 5 536
TrWRKY021 chr7.jg2559 Tr7O:16132786–16135642 I 4 542
TrWRKY022 chr15.jg1220 Tr7P:8126860–8129794 I 4 546
TrWRKY023 chr11.jg2218 Tr3P:14403172–14409407 I 5 550
TrWRKY024 chr5.jg6632 Tr5O:44854411–44858046 I 5 550
TrWRKY025 chr13.jg5557 Tr5P:36394815–36398400 I 4 566
TrWRKY026 chr3.jg3718 Tr3O:24080424–24083938 I 4 568
TrWRKY027 chr3.jg9591 Tr3O:62992430–62995677 I 4 576
TrWRKY028 chr13.jg5883 Tr5P:38801923–38805881 I 4 611
TrWRKY029 chr7.jg4480 Tr7O:27919168–27923981 I 7 625
TrWRKY030 chr7.jg4830 Tr7O:30168002–30171661 I 4 659
TrWRKY031 chr3.jg54 Tr3O:364289–368532 I 4 661
TrWRKY032 chr13.jg5616 Tr5P:36858900–36863941 I 4 667
TrWRKY033 chr9.jg1959 Tr1P:13473819–13478644 I 4 668
TrWRKY034 chr1.jg2939 Tr1O:21500495–21505105 I 4 669
TrWRKY035 chr14.jg4072 Tr6P:26714269–26720795 I 6 897
TrWRKY036 chr1.jg1973 Tr1O:14366719–14368228 IIa 3 249
TrWRKY037 chr9.jg1140 Tr1P:7918363–7919974 IIa 3 249
TrWRKY038 chr1.jg1972 Tr1O:14356694–14358566 IIa 3 284
TrWRKY039 chr9.jg1139 Tr1P:7914343–7916022 IIa 3 285
TrWRKY040 chr1.jg2956 Tr1O:21601386–21603577 IIa 3 288
TrWRKY041 chr10.jg540 Tr2P:3685109–3687534 IIa 3 288
TrWRKY042 chr12.jg1297 Tr4P:8797774–8800048 IIa 4 314
TrWRKY043 chr4.jg283 Tr4O:2101646–2103890 IIa 4 314
TrWRKY044 chr14.jg4718 Tr6P:31206787–31208142 IIa 3 321
TrWRKY045 chr6.jg5830 Tr6O:39546655–39548025 IIa 3 322
TrWRKY046 chr3.jg2104 Tr3O:14203754–14206210 IIb 4 367
TrWRKY047 chr6.jg3356 Tr6O:22856414–22858929 IIb 3 388
TrWRKY048 chr3.jg2106 Tr3O:14209147–14217688 IIb 7 407
TrWRKY049 chr11.jg4323 Tr3P:28623299–28628203 IIb 5 420
TrWRKY050 chr13.jg6040 Tr5P:39734181–39741546 IIb 5 445
TrWRKY051 chr5.jg5942 Tr5O:39784978–39789205 IIb 5 450
TrWRKY052 chr4.jg9125 Tr4O:64569075–64575507 IIb 6 473
TrWRKY053 chr3.jg4106 Tr3O:26548251–26551282 IIb 3 494
TrWRKY054 chr8.jg8224 Tr8O:57583206–57585522 IIb 5 496
TrWRKY055 chr8.jg8226 Tr8O:57595609–57597977 IIb 5 496
TrWRKY056 chr11.jg6061 Tr3P:40558111–40560701 IIb 4 497
TrWRKY057 chr9.jg3992 Tr1P:26841184–26844303 IIb 3 501
TrWRKY058 chr14.jg619 Tr6P:4268713–4272199 IIb 3 521
TrWRKY059 chr4.jg1879 Tr4O:13724492–13727623 IIb 4 556
TrWRKY060 chr8.jg7568 Tr8O:52902921–52906615 IIb 4 556
TrWRKY061 chr10.jg1880 Tr2P:13055576–13058377 IIb 5 564
TrWRKY062 chr10.jg1240 Tr2P:8565304–8567908 IIb 5 565
TrWRKY063 chr6.jg3259 Tr6O:22013991–22017015 IIb 3 573
TrWRKY064 chr4.jg5478 Tr4O:39794266–39798649 IIb 4 611
TrWRKY065 chr14.jg1701 Tr6P:11603027–11604397 IIc 2 137
TrWRKY066 chr9.jg1339 Tr1P:9315424–9316217 IIc 2 152
TrWRKY067 chr16.jg6071 Tr8P:43479876–43480502 IIc 1 172
TrWRKY068 chr9.jg4957 Tr1P:33609237–33616647 IIc 1 188
TrWRKY069 chr3.jg7827 Tr3O:50998463–50999731 IIc 1 191
TrWRKY070 chr12.jg4938 Tr4P:32185999–32188206 IIc 1 215
TrWRKY071 chr3.jg7996 Tr3O:52089540–52090962 IIc 1 229
TrWRKY072 chr8.jg6405 Tr8O:44781392–44782814 IIc 1 229
TrWRKY073 chr7.jg896 Tr7O:5551407–5554787 IIc 2 241
TrWRKY074 chr16.jg4775 Tr8P:33960705–33961961 IIc 3 242
TrWRKY075 chr11.jg7038 Tr3P:46907394–46909934 IIc 2 246
TrWRKY076 chr8.jg6410 Tr8O:44809752–44812152 IIc 2 250
TrWRKY077 chr14.jg1115 Tr6P:7734201–7741598 IIc 4 266
TrWRKY078 chr2.jg886 Tr2O:6217545–6220827 IIc 2 273
TrWRKY079 chr7.jg7388 Tr7O:46299748–46301293 IIc 2 289
TrWRKY080 chr3.jg7829 Tr3O:51008820–51011087 IIc 2 313
TrWRKY081 chr4.jg7787 Tr4O:55224476–55225976 IIc 2 318
TrWRKY082 chr1.jg12558 Tr1O:86758945–86760457 IIc 2 323
TrWRKY083 chr12.jg7469 Tr4P:49027733–49032235 IIc 6 343
TrWRKY084 chr1.jg10510 Tr1O:72595887–72597616 IIc 2 358
TrWRKY085 chr10.jg2272 Tr2P:15800686–15803310 IIc 2 368
TrWRKY086 chr16.jg5753 Tr8P:41361956–41363810 IIc 2 404
TrWRKY087 chr8.jg8112 Tr8O:56771672–56773457 IIc 2 406
TrWRKY088 chr14.jg1447 Tr6P:9967786–9968685 IId 1 149
TrWRKY089 chr16.jg297 Tr8P:1981047–1981864 IId 1 153
TrWRKY090 chr5.jg6489 Tr5O:43735385–43739232 IId 1 165
TrWRKY091 chr7.jg1916 Tr7O:11673947–11677464 IId 1 165
TrWRKY092 chr3.jg10600 Tr3O:70128861–70129969 IId 2 223
TrWRKY093 chr3.jg376 Tr3O:2419836–2420993 IId 2 245
TrWRKY094 chr5.jg633 Tr5O:4407752–4409399 IId 2 250
TrWRKY095 chr3.jg418 Tr3O:2696699–2704267 IId 6 258
TrWRKY096 chr11.jg9390 Tr3P:63448611–63450828 IId 3 260
TrWRKY097 chr8.jg8664 Tr8O:60972016–60973116 IId 2 290
TrWRKY098 chr12.jg3044 Tr4P:20303684–20304867 IId 2 314
TrWRKY099 chr4.jg8047 Tr4O:57107571–57109224 IId 2 327
TrWRKY100 chr9.jg1028 Tr1P:7138533–7141172 IId 2 345
TrWRKY101 chr9.jg954 Tr1P:6662343–6664904 IId 2 349
TrWRKY102 chr9.jg5416 Tr1P:36708761–36713161 IId 3 350
TrWRKY103 chr8.jg7125 Tr8O:49744559–49746242 IIe 1 154
TrWRKY104 chr10.jg758 Tr2P:5125509–5126589 IIe 2 215
TrWRKY105 chr8.jg6926 Tr8O:48516893–48517971 IIe 2 215
TrWRKY106 chr4.jg10192 Tr4O:72095432–72096468 IIe 2 237
TrWRKY107 chr7.jg7373 Tr7O:46208011–46209900 IIe 2 257
TrWRKY108 chr15.jg4042 Tr7P:26578475–26580507 IIe 2 259
TrWRKY109 chr6.jg179 Tr6O:1356330–1358362 IIe 2 259
TrWRKY110 chr13.jg4575 Tr5P:30183713–30187166 IIe 2 262
TrWRKY111 chr4.jg3667 Tr4O:26832093–26835148 IIe 2 262
TrWRKY112 chr9.jg5891 Tr1P:39840694–39844509 IIe 5 277
TrWRKY113 chr4.jg8395 Tr4O:59509470–59511001 IIe 1 296
TrWRKY114 chr1.jg12229 Tr1O:84484169–84486864 IIe 2 307
TrWRKY115 chr9.jg7902 Tr1P:53219706–53221002 IIe 2 317
TrWRKY116 chr16.jg1080 Tr8P:7667356–7669114 IIe 2 324
TrWRKY117 chr16.jg3334 Tr8P:23935985–23937743 IIe 2 324
TrWRKY118 chr8.jg542 Tr8O:4059377–4061115 IIe 2 329
TrWRKY119 chr1.jg7088 Tr1O:49874567–49875820 IIe 2 337
TrWRKY120 chr7.jg3290 Tr7O:20634234–20635490 IIe 2 337
TrWRKY121 chr1.jg8379 Tr1O:58443647–58446096 IIe 2 370
TrWRKY122 chr6.jg3054 Tr6O:20633120–20636355 IIe 2 483
TrWRKY123 chr10.jg1494 Tr2P:10329830–10331679 IIe 2 517
TrWRKY124 chr12.jg6707 Tr4P:43890308–43904513 IIe 11 919
TrWRKY125 chr14.jg2719 Tr6P:18441055–18442214 III 1 182
TrWRKY126 chr3.jg6078 Tr3O:40310959–40312118 III 1 182
TrWRKY127 chr16.jg69 Tr8P:454817–456279 III 2 242
TrWRKY128 chr3.jg8340 Tr3O:54563576–54565215 III 2 263
TrWRKY129 chr1.jg1680 Tr1O:12254543–12257169 III 2 302
TrWRKY130 chr9.jg3115 Tr1P:20932379–20934360 III 2 305
TrWRKY131 chr9.jg6983 Tr1P:47150282–47152529 III 3 307
TrWRKY132 chr16.jg1458 Tr8P:10549490–10551175 III 2 309
TrWRKY133 chr2.jg4287 Tr2O:28961889–28963324 III 2 321
TrWRKY134 chr4.jg11883 Tr4O:83642647–83644458 III 2 321
TrWRKY135 chr2.jg6049 Tr2O:40646492–40650667 III 2 331
TrWRKY136 chr5.jg4951 Tr5O:33015650–33019304 III 2 335
TrWRKY137 chr13.jg1501 Tr5P:10308563–10310061 III 2 338
TrWRKY138 chr7.jg7162 Tr7O:44915496–44917119 III 2 338
TrWRKY139 chr16.jg1332 Tr8P:9621061–9623396 III 2 345
TrWRKY140 chr12.jg6924 Tr4P:45351376–45352661 III 2 357
TrWRKY141 chr12.jg6940 Tr4P:45450209–45451499 III 2 357
TrWRKY142 chr6.jg2768 Tr6O:18717189–18720732 III 3 807
TrWRKY143 chr5.jg5407 Tr5O:36181101–36185875 III 3 835
TrWRKY144 chr5.jg5428 Tr5O:36242747–36247552 III 4 913
TrWRKY145 chr5.jg5405 Tr5O:36173904–36179186 III 4 1,063
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15610/table-1

Classification and phylogenetic analysis in white clover

An unrooted phylogenetic tree with 145 TrWRKY genes using neighbor joining methods (Fig. 1) was constructed to further explore the phylogenetic relationship of the WRKY transcription factor family in the white clover. This unrooted tree intuitively reflected the evolutionary status and grouping attribution of 145 members of the WRKY family. As shown in Fig. 1, the white clover WRKY proteins could be classified into three large groups (Group I-II) on the basis of the classifications of WRKYs in Arabidopsis. Specifically, the largest number of WRKY members in Group II was 84, while Group I and Group III had 37 and 24 members, respectively. In addition, Group II was further classified into five subgroups (SubGroup IIa-IIe). The most numerous subgroups were subgroup IIc, with 22 members. Next are IIb and IIe, with 21 and 20 members, respectively. Subgroup IId has 13 members. The subgroup with the lowest number of members in Group II is IIa, with only eight members. At the same time, the unrooted phylogenetic tree showed that the distribution of WRKY genes in white clover and Arabidopsis was highly consistent.

Phylogenetic analysis of white clover WRKY proteins.

Figure 1: Phylogenetic analysis of white clover WRKY proteins.

The NJ tree was constructed from the amino acid sequences of TrWRKY using MEGA4 with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The white clover WRKY proteins were grouped into three groups (Group I, labeled with red solid circle, II, and III, labeled with blue black hollow circle), and the Group II was further divided into five subgroups (IIa labeled with purple solid triangle, IIb labeled with blue solid square, IIc labeled with pink solid diamond, IId labeled with green solid triangle, and IIe labeled with cyan hollow square).

Motif composition distribution analysis of TrWRKY proteins in white clover

To further our understanding of the molecular structure and function of the TrWRKY gene family in white clover, we have analyzed the conserved motifs of WRKY gene family members and found the same subgroup had similar motif composition. Ten individual motifs were identified by the MEME tool, revealing the distinct regions of TrWRKYs (Fig. 2, and Figs. S1S4). As Fig. 2 shows, the TrWRKY genes in Group I have contained nine motifs in total, most of them (except TrWRKY001, 003, 005, 015, 035) contained motif 3 and motif 6, while motif 3 has “WRKY” residues (see Fig. S1), which confirmed WRKY domain in these TrWRKY genes. Motif 1 is present in TrWRKY genes without motif 3, which also contained “WRKY” residues (see Fig. S1). The results showed WRKY domain has diverged in white clover. In addition, there are double WRKY domains identified in Group I members, even three copies of WRKY domains, which is also supported by domain search results. Group II and III have shown similar results, each TrWRKY gene contained motif 1 or motif 3, even two motifs, which consisted of BLAST and domain search results (Figs. S2 and S3). Meanwhile, the results of conservation motif composition also supported the results of sequence similarity and phylogenetic tree analysis, demonstrating clear structural motif differences between the three group. For example, most members of Group I contain motif 3, while members of Group III contain motif 1 (see Fig. S4), similar appearance was also discovered in Group II, each subgroup has diff motif composition patterns, see Fig. S2. In each subgroup, the proteins harbor a similar number and type of motif, which suggested the functional similarities of these TrWRKYs.

Distribution of conserved motifs of TrWRKY genes Group I in white clover.

Figure 2: Distribution of conserved motifs of TrWRKY genes Group I in white clover.

Cis-acting elements analysis of the TrWRKYs promoter

Promoter cis-elements influence the initiation of gene transcription. We performed a bioinformatics analysis to identify possible cis-elements in the promoter sequences of TrWRKYs. PlantCARE was used to identify putative cis-acting elements in the 1,000 bp upstream sequence of each TrWRKY gene promoter. A total of 15 stress response elements, consisting of TC-rich repeats (the cis-regulatory element for defense along with stress response), ACE (cis-regulatory element that engages in light response), LTR (cis-regulatory element that plays a role in low-temperature response), TCA-element (cis-regulatory element with a role in salicylic acid response), SARE (cis-regulatory element with a role in salicylic acid response), ABRE (cis-regulatory element associated with the abscisic acid response), AuxRR-core (cis-regulatory element with a role in auxin response), G-box (cis-regulatory element with a role in light response), CGTCA-motif (cis-regulatory element with a role in the MeJA-response), TGACG-motif (cis-regulatory element associated with MeJA-response), P-box (gibberellin-responsive element), GARE-motif (gibberellin-responsive element), WUN-motif (wound-responsive element), MBS (MYB binding site associated with drought-inducibility), and MRE (MYB binding site associated with light response), were identified (Fig. S5). All TrWRKYs had at least one stress response-linked cis-regulatory element. The cis-regulatory elements for hormone modulation consisting of CGTCA motifs, ABREs, AuxRR cores, P-boxes, TCA elements and TGA elements were also uncovered in numerous TrWRKY promoter regions. Overall, 64 TrWRKYs (44%) had more than one ABRE motif, which indicated the prospective abscisic acid response under stress conditions. Approximately 66 TrWRKYs (46%) had one or more CGTCA motifs that demonstrated the MeJA response potential, and the TCA element, TGACG motif, P-box, and AuxRR core were found in 30, 60, 12 and 8 TrWRKYs, respectively (Fig. S5). 68 G-box, 23 LTR, 29 MBS, and 25 TC-rich repeats were also found in TrWRKY promoter regions, which illustrated that these genes might play a role in cold, drought inducibility and defense responses.

Chromosome localization, gene duplication and Ka/Ks analysis of TrWRKY genes in white clover

To determine the evolution and expansion of WRKY genes, we used the MCScanX and Circos softwares to construct the distribution of WRKY genes across chromosomes. All TrWRKY genes were distributed across 16 chromosomes, but they were not uniformly located on these chromosomes, see Fig. 3. For example, the chromosomes TrChr1O, TrChr1P, TrChr8O and TrChr8P harbor more TrWRKY genes than other chromosomes, such as TrChr2O and TrChr2P. Based on BLAST results, there were 124 gene duplication events identified by MCScanX software, including 118 segment duplications (SD) and six tandem duplications (TD). The results have suggested chromosome doubling helps to bring about WRKY expansion in white clover, and distributions of TrWRKY were similar between some doubling chromosomes, for example, chromosomes TrChr6O and TrChr6P, chromosome TrChr5O and TrChr5P. However, there are some divergences between doubling chromosomes, such as chromosome TrChr3O and TrChr3P, chromosome TrChr7O and TrChr7P. The results suggested TrWRKY genes have undergone deep diversion in sub-genome evolution, some chromosomes have expanded TrWRKY members by gene duplication events, while some duplications have been purged, which caused some TrWRKY genes hots with numerous members clustering.

Chromosome distribution and expansion analysis of WRKY transcription factors in white clover.

Figure 3: Chromosome distribution and expansion analysis of WRKY transcription factors in white clover.

Red lines show duplications between members of the Group I, purple lines show duplications between members of the subgroup IIa, green lines show duplications between members of the subgroup IIb, yellow lines show duplications between members of the subgroup IIc, greys lines show duplications between members of the subgroup IId, cyan lines show duplications between members of the subgroup IIe, and blue lines show duplications between members of Group III.

To estimate the divergence time of white clover WRKYs, synonymous (Ks) and nonsynonymous (Ka) substitutions between gene duplication pairs were calculated using the KaKs_Calculator in TBtool. When Ka/Ks <1, the genes experience purifying selection, which means the selection process could neutralize mutation to maintain the stability of the protein; in contrast, when Ka/Ks >1, the genes experience positive selection, which means great mutation happens in genes and eventually leads to a change in coded proteins. Our identified WRKY gene pairs had Ka/Ks values ranging from 0.06 to 0.89, proving that all of these genes experienced a purification selection process in white clover (Table S2).

Genetic regulation network analysis of white clover WRKY genes

Gene regulation networks (GRN) are increasingly used to explore the system-level functions of genes, we have reconstructed GRNs of TrWRKY and their interacting genes based public interaction database. The GRNs consisted of 349 genes and 463 interactions, as Fig. 4 shown. From GRNs, we have found most of TrWRKY have interacted with dozens of function genes, consisting of TrWRKY function on the transcription regulation process. For example, TrWRKY084 interacted with 37 genes, TrWRKY131 with 32 genes, and TrWRKY100 with 30 genes, the results indicated these TrWRKY genes played important roles in white clover lifespan. Gene Ontology (GO) annotation of these interacting genes was retrieved, and GO enrichment analysis was performed using the topGO package on the R platform. The results showed they were mainly distributed in the nucleus, see Fig. 5, which supported TrWRKY genes also functioned in the nucleus. In addition, molecular functions of these function genes were highly focused on transcription regulator activity, while they were mainly participating in the regulation of the transcription process, the results have confirmed the function of TrWRKY genes. It was notable that these genes were also enriched on terms “response to wounding” and “phosphorylay signal transduction system”, which are plant popular descriptions in response to abiotic stress, these results suggested TrWRKY genes probable function in response to abiotic stress.

Gene regulatory network analysis of TrWRKY genes and their interactions in white clover.

Figure 4: Gene regulatory network analysis of TrWRKY genes and their interactions in white clover.

Gene regulatory network (GRN) of TrWRKY genes and their interactions were generated based Arabidopsis interactions, which was displayed with Cytoscape. Pink nodes correspond TrWRKY genes, while violet nodes correspond the genes interacted with TrWRKY genes, the cyan lines represented interactions in white clover.
Gene Ontology enrichment analysis of interaction genes with TrWRKY genes.

Figure 5: Gene Ontology enrichment analysis of interaction genes with TrWRKY genes.

The GO enrichment analysis showed the involvement of interaction genes with TrWRKY genes in biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components. Red dots represent GO terms from biological process (BP), green dots represent GO terms from molecular function (MF), while blue dots represent GO terms from cellular component (CC). Dot size represents the number of genes involving in the GO term, the X-axis is p-value of topGO enrichment analysis, with -log10 transformation, -log10 (p), while the Y-axis is GO terms.

Expression analysis of TrWRKY genes in response to the cold stress

In order to investigate TrWRKY genes function in response to abiotic stress, we have adopted our previous RNA-seq data under cold stress to assess their expression profiles. The white clover was treated with cold stress at 4 °C, and RNA-seq was analyzed at eight time points, including 0 h, 30 min, 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 72 h. All expressing TrWRKY genes (with FPKM value larger than 1) were collected, and their expressional value (FPKM) was grouped with a violin plot, and results showed TrWRKY genes were increased in response to cold stress, see Fig. S6. Especially, TrWRKY genes were rapidly activated at 30 min, and keeping a high expressional level in the following stages, the results suggested TrWRKY gene played critical roles in the early stage under cold stress. Expression profiles of these TrWRKY genes were clustered and displayed using the heatmap function, the results showed most of the TrWRKY genes were highly expressed at 30 min in response to cold stress, see Fig. 6. The finding consisted of violin plot analysis, which confirmed their rapid response to cold stress. Among these TrWRKY members, some were expressly high-expressing at 30 min, for example, TrWRKY017, 040, 049, 064, 065, 079, 085, 100, 102, 113, 138. Combining their hub-function in previous GRNs, such as TrWRKY100 and TrWRKY 113, they would be assigned rapid and critical regulation function in response to cold stress.

The expressional profiles of TrWRKY genes in response to cold stress.

Figure 6: The expressional profiles of TrWRKY genes in response to cold stress.

The expressional profiles of TrWRKY genes were retrieved from RNA-seq database with accession numbers: PRJNA781064. There were eight time points, including 0 h, 30 min, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 72 h, each time point has three biological replications. Mean expression levels (FPKM values) were measured by Salmon software (version 0.12.0), and they were displayed using ggplots package of R platform.

qRT-PCR validation of TrWRKY genes expression in response to cold stress

To validate the rapid response to cold stress, we have performed qRT-PCR analysis of seven TrWRKY genes with four time points, including 0 h, 30 min (0.5 h), 1 h, and 3 h. The qRT-RCR analysis results have confirmed their rapid and highly expressed in response to cold stress, see Fig. 7. All TrWRKY genes have shown a dramatic increase followed by a mild decrease in expression, the qRT-PCR and RNA-seq results are concordant, showing a similar pattern of TrWRKY genes expression in response to cold stress. These findings demonstrate that the TrWRKY genes are actively involved in the early response to cold stress and play critical roles in regulating gene expression in white clover.

qRT-PCR analysis of TrWRKY genes in response to cold stress.

Figure 7: qRT-PCR analysis of TrWRKY genes in response to cold stress.

The X-axis represent time points in response to cold stress, and Y-axis represent relative expression level of TrWRKY genes, which set expression level at “0 h” time point as 1. The expression level were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method as method section described.

Discussion

WRKY TFs are well indicated to regulate various physiological processes in plants, from plant growth, development, to respond to abiotic stress (Eulgem et al., 2000; Ülker & Somssich, 2004). With more and more plant genome sequencing accomplished, numerous WRKY TFs have been identified from many plants, with important roles in various physiological processes, especially their critical function in response to biotic or abiotic stress (Chen et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2016; Dong et al., 2019; Li et al., 2014; Rinerson et al., 2015; Singh et al., 2019). However, there is no report on the white clover, which is widely distributed on global earth.

In the present research, there are 145 WRKY TFs identified in white clover, whose assembly genome size is 841 Mb, the number is about two folds of Arabidopsis (72 members) (Abdullah-Zawawi et al., 2021). Based on previous research, the numbers of WRKY TFs are variations between different plants, which are not straightly related to genome sizes. For example, Arabidopsis contains 72 members in 119 Mb, cucumber contains 61 members in 225 Mb (Chen et al., 2020b), rice contains 128 members in 466 Mb (Abdullah-Zawawi et al., 2021), Medicago truncatula contains 93 members in 420 Mb (Song & Nan, 2014), and soybean contains 188 members in 994 Mb (Yu et al., 2016), etc. In these plants, rice and soybean have undergone whole genome duplication, which brought about WRKY TFs double in the genome. Therefore, white clover with the tetraploid genome, contained more WRKY TFs than plants with the diploid genome, such as Arabidopsis, cucumber. Besides, gene duplication is also considered with important role in the expansion of gene families, which are mainly classified as tandem duplication and segmental duplication based on duplication patterns. There were 118 segmental duplication events and six tandem duplication events in white clover, the results suggested segmental duplication played critical roles in the expansion of TrWRKY TFs. Meanwhile, the tandem duplication also has made minor contributions in the expansion of TrWRKY TFs compared to those with less WRKY members in the genome, such as cucumber (Chen et al., 2020b). Hence, gene duplication is the primary means of expansion and evolution of the white clover WRKY gene family.

Increasing reports have shown WRKY genes have played important roles in the regulation of signaling transduction, and transcription, especially in response to biotic or abiotic stress (Li et al., 2020; Waqas et al., 2019; Wei et al., 2021; Xie et al., 2018). In the present research, the genetic regulation network was reconstructed with 463 interactions. Most of the TrWRKY genes have more interacting genes, for example, TrWRKY065 interacts with 46 genes, TrWRKY086 with 42 genes, TrWRKY084 with 37 genes, TrWRKY131 with 32 genes, and TrWRKY018 with 31 genes, etc. According to GO enrichment analysis results, most genes had focused on the transcription process, regulation of the metabolic process, gene expression, etc. These results also confirmed that WRKY TFs functions were highly conservative in white clover. Meanwhile, molecular function results were also supported these findings, most interaction genes were annotated with DNA binding activity, implying that they are regulated by transcription factors. It is worth noting that the GO term “protein dimerization activity” was also enriched in GRN genes, which intensely suggested some TrWRKY genes interacted with each other to perform their function, for example, TrWRKY065 interacted with TrWRKY100, TrWRKY084 interacted with TrWRKY086, TrWRKY135 interacted with TrWRKY113, etc. Similar opinions were also reported in other plants, for example, the interaction of homoeologous WRKY18 and WRKY40 in Arabidopsis was confirmed with important roles in response to biotic stress (Abeysinghe, Lam & Ng, 2019); JrWRKY2 and JrWRKY7 were interacting and formatting into homodimers in response to abiotic stress and ABA treatment from Juglans (Yang et al., 2017); and WRKY genes were also found to form dimerization in rice (Cheng et al., 2019). These findings indicated function types of TrWRKY genes were consistent with other plants, which is needed more molecular experiments to validate. In addition, TrWRKY genes were characterized to participate in response to wounding, this result was also consisted with previous reports (Srivastava et al., 2022). In Arabidopsis, WRKY8 expression was wounding-induced and confirms involvement in basal defense (Chen, Zhang & Yu, 2010); Preferential expression of PsWRKY and its interaction with downstream genes in benzylisoquinoline alkaloids (BIAs) were possible involvement in response to wounding in Papaver somniferum (Mishra et al., 2013); OsWRKY53 was characterized in response to wounding stress, which was regulated by OsMKK4-OsMPK1 cascade, implying WRKY was involved in phosphorelay signal transduction pathway (Yoo et al., 2014). This conclusion was also testified in the present research, we have found that interactions of TrWRKY genes were focused on the phosphorelay signal transduction system, it has consisted of WRKY regulated by MAPK cascade in rice. The above analysis and discussion showed that the WRKY gene family could widely participate in various signaling pathways in response to biotic or abiotic stresses.

WRKY TFs have well documented in plant growth and various stress processes. Our previous RNA-seq has shown most of TrWRKY TFs were remarkably upregulated in response to cold stress (Zhang et al., 2022). All cold treatment samples were more highly expressed than the control sample, except the 12H sample, see Fig. S6. These results showed genes were down-regulated expressions at night, while TrWRKY genes were up-regulated by cold stress, and the final expressions were slightly upregulated. Other time points showed the expressions of most TrWRKY genes were sharply up-regulated under cold stress, especially at 30 min, there were 43 TrWRKY genes up-regulated at this time point, implying that these TrWRKY genes quickly response to cold stress. This finding was consistent with other plants, for example, in grapevine, Wang et al. (2014) have demonstrated 36 VvWRKYs were changed following cold exposure and identified 15 VvWRKYs in two or more cold expression datasets, intensely suggesting their key functions in response to cold stress; similar research has reported 10 WRKYs were strongly expressing during cold stress in tomato (Chen et al., 2015). These genes represented candidate genes for future functional analysis of WRKYs involved in the cold related signal pathways. By transgenic analysis, VvWRKY28 has greatly improved the tolerance of Arabidopsis to cold stress, bound to promote downstream genes, including (RAB18, COR15A, ERD10, PIF4, COR47, and ICS1), and promoted their expressions (Liu et al., 2022). PmWRKY57 was also identified to improve cold tolerance, and induce the expression levels of cold-response genes in Arabidopsis transgenic lines, including AtCOR6.6, AtCOR47, AtKIN1, and AtRCI2A (Wang et al., 2022). In addition, KoWRKY40 was demonstrated to involved in ICE-CBF-COR signaling pathway, functioned as an important regulator under cold stress (Fei et al., 2022). Meanwhile, CdWRKY2 from bermudagrass was also revealed as a positive regulator in cold stress by targeting CdCBF1 promoters and activating its expression, improving cold tolerance by opening the CBF-signaling pathway (Huang et al., 2022). In white clover, there were 19 target genes of TrWRKY genes identified with the AP2 domain, see Table S3, which was the conservative domain of CBF genes, implying TrWRKY genes probably conferred cold tolerance by regulated ICE-CBF-COR signaling pathway. However, the molecular mechanism of their regulation is still unclear, there are more experiments needed to explore their function in detail.

Conclusion

In summary, we have identified 145 WRKY genes in white clover, and the following analysis was performed: gene identification and classification, phylogenetic and motif composition distribution analysis, cis-acting elements analysis, chromosomal mapping and gene duplication analysis, gene expression analysis, Ka/Ks analysis, genetic regulation network analysis and Gene Ontology annotation, and quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis. We found that the evolution and expansion of the WRKY gene family may be closely related to the replication of segment and tandem replication within the WRKY genes. Meanwhile, we identified WRKY genes that may be involved in response to cold stress. The results of RNA-seq demonstrated that WRKY gene expression was partially up-regulated in response to cold stress. qRT-PCR results directly revealed that the WRKY gene plays an important role in response to early cold stress in white clover. The results of this study suggest a foundation for further studies on the function of the WRKY gene family in response to biotic or abiotic stresses in white clover.

Supplemental Information

Primers used for qRT-PCR analysis of the TrWRKY genes.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15610/supp-1

Ka/Ks values of TrWRKY gene pairs in the white clover.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15610/supp-2

AP2 domains present in target genes of TrWRKY genes in white clover.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15610/supp-3

Raw data of qRT-PCR of TrWRKY genes.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15610/supp-4

Sequence logos for motifs identified from TrWRKY genes.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15610/supp-5

The distribution of conserved motifs from TrWRKY genes (Group Ⅱ) in white clover.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15610/supp-6

The distribution of conserved motifs from TrWRKY genes (Group III) in white clover.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15610/supp-7

Phylogenetic clustering and conserved protein motifs of TrWRKY genes in white clover.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15610/supp-8

The distribution of cis-acting elements in TrWRKY promoters.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15610/supp-9

The violin plot of all TrWRKY genes based their expression levels in response to cold stress.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15610/supp-10
6 Citations   Views   Downloads