Measuring the developmental function of peer review: a multi-dimensional, cross-disciplinary analysis of peer review reports from 740 academic journals
Our article 'Measuring the developmental function of peer review: a multi-dimensional, cross-disciplinary analysis of peer review reports' was one of the top 5 most viewed #DataScience and #SciencePolicy articles published in @PeerJLife in 2022!
I am so glad for this overview of our latest @thePeerJ study on #peerreview by @DalmeetS for @PhysicsToday. Thanks to @LudoWaltman & Brooks Hanson from @ThrivingEarth for their nice comments. Here is the original study: https://t.co/f5cnxKDRr0 https://t.co/9onTpGvFx4
Journal Editors who say it's hard to find reviewers might find this study useful. To quote, “#Junior reviewers generally ensure comparatively highest developmental standards of reports” So? Let's trust #EarlyCareerResearchers and invite them to review! https://t.co/x8krJoBvK7
If you want a reviewer who is going to try to improve a paper, get an early career. New @thePeerJ paper n reviewer reports. Lots of places to argue, but valuable look into what is usually confidential. https://t.co/V9QjVWjVks
Measuring the developmental function of peer review: a multi-dimensional, cross-disciplinary analysis of peer review reports from 740 academic journals - “Reports submitted to social science and economics journals show the highest developmental standards” https://t.co/aviU1Pv9dF