Measuring the developmental function of peer review: a multi-dimensional, cross-disciplinary analysis of peer review reports from 740 academic journals

Social science journal reviewers take the longest, and write the most demanding (developmental) reviews. Median days to deliver a review: Social science: 24 Physical science: 19 Life science: 17 Health / medical: 15 https://t.co/TE6k0Se4yM https://t.co/yfQ5u4UgGg https://t.co/h3oENfqGWL
RT @mehmanib: Check out our paper on reviewer performance in different cohorts and disciplines along with its peer review reports #PeerRevi…
1313 days ago
RT @mehmanib: Check out our paper on reviewer performance in different cohorts and disciplines along with its peer review reports #PeerRevi…
1313 days ago
Which peers review best? A study of 1.3M reviews: “Reports submitted to social science & economics journals show the highest developmental standards. Reports from junior reviewers, women & reviewers from Western Europe are generally more developmental…” https://t.co/o2bX72GRva https://t.co/iNG7Ljr5Fr
RT @mehmanib: Check out our paper on reviewer performance in different cohorts and disciplines along with its peer review reports #PeerRevi…
RT @mehmanib: Check out our paper on reviewer performance in different cohorts and disciplines along with its peer review reports #PeerRevi…
RT @mehmanib: Check out our paper on reviewer performance in different cohorts and disciplines along with its peer review reports #PeerRevi…
RT @mehmanib: Check out our paper on reviewer performance in different cohorts and disciplines along with its peer review reports #PeerRevi…
1313 days ago
Check out our paper on reviewer performance in different cohorts and disciplines along with its peer review reports #PeerReview #ScholarlyPublishing #OpenPeerReview @squazzoni @dagarcos and Francisco Grimaldo https://t.co/Lo5aR4lp8c via @PeerJLife