Update: the article about "no mow may" bees that I criticized was officially retracted by the journal on 18 Nov 2022. I’m glad the scientific record has been corrected. It would have been nice if more details were provided in the retraction notice.
https://t.co/kJOfxK12OD https://t.co/h38u3mm5v9
Study in question: https://t.co/lwzSyxfg5s
Vouchers MATTER people. Ecologists, VOUCHER your specimens. Sight IDs are NOT VOUCHERS. Specimens or it's bad science (some exceptions apply) https://t.co/0bpaoTlUmM
#NoMowMay lawns have higher pollinator richness and abundances: An engaged community provides floral resources for pollinators
https://t.co/rjIYUdjJvs @PeerJLife
@BeeBabette @naturealexk @AustralEcology See publisher's note on this one. https://t.co/r65R4H0fVb This paper was referred to a lot by ENGOs a few months ago. Sigh.