NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Submission

Submission sequences to GenBank

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26636v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Miroslav Marinov conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, approved the final draft, obtained the samples.

Denitsa Teofanova conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Georgi Radoslavov analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Peter I Hristov conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research - BAS provided full approval for this purely observational research.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research - BAS gives permission for field experiment.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

The sequences described here are accessible via GenBank accession numbers MG920357 – MG920486.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads