All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.
Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.
Dear Authors,
I am pleased to inform you that after the last round of revision, the manuscript has been improved a lot, and it can be accepted for publication.
Congratulations on accepting your manuscript, and thank you for your interest in submitting your work to PeerJ.
With Thanks
[# PeerJ Staff Note - this decision was reviewed and approved by Julin Maloof, a PeerJ Section Editor covering this Section #]
Dear Authors
The manuscript needs a minor revision to be reconsidered for publication. The authors are invited to revise the paper considering all the suggestions made by the reviewers. Please note that requested changes are required for publication.
With Thanks
[# PeerJ Staff Note: The review process has identified that the English language must be improved. PeerJ can provide language editing services - please contact us at copyediting@peerj.com for pricing (be sure to provide your manuscript number and title) #]
1. The manuscript needs moderate English grammatical and structural polishing.
2. Authors must add more information about the crop, including its economic importance.
3. Kindly shorten the length of the sentence... lines 49, 51. Also, note that a sentence should not occupy more than two lines. Kindly check throughout the manuscript.
1. Mention the software name used for plotting histogram plots.
1. Authors need to crosscheck the L193 with table 2.
2. L229, crosscheck the average value of Xgwm515 with table 5.
1. Kindly mention the abbreviations used throughout the manuscript.
2. L171 and L496, please check the cited reference year in the text and end of the manuscript.
The article complies with the criteria expressed by your journal in terms of Basic reporting.
The article complies with the criteria expressed by your journal in terms of Experimental design.
The article complies with the criteria expressed by your journal in terms of Validity of the findings.
I suggest that the years of the study be written in the material and method section (Line 108).
Zadoks growth scale value can be given for the periods specified in line 119.
The number of spikes is written in line 215, it should be corrected as number of spikelet.
I suggest literature support for the explanations in the section starting with "with the descriptive..." between lines 261-264.
It would be appropriate to review the publications that do not have a DOI number in the Reference Section .
The study named "Phenotypic and genetic diversity of doubled haploid wheat population and molecular validation for spike characteristics, end-use quality, and biofortification capacity" is an original study containing a extensive data set. The subject has been taken in many aspects and the results have been sufficiently discussed. In addition, the manuscript is clearly written in professional, unambiguous language. I think that these results will be an important resource for researchers working with plant breeding.
Please find attached manuscript file for specific comments, edits and queries.
Please find attached manuscript file for specific comments, edits and queries.
Please find attached manuscript file for specific comments, edits and queries.
Please find attached manuscript file for specific comments, edits and queries.
All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.