PeerJ Author & Reviewer

1,325 Points

Contributions by role

Contributions by subject area

Andrew D Vigotsky

PeerJ Author & Reviewer

Summary

Bioengineering Kinesiology Orthopedics

Editing Journals

Past or current institution affiliations

Arizona State University

Northwestern University

Work details

Graduate Student

Northwestern University

September 2016

Biomedical Engineering

PeerJ Contributions

November 3, 2020

A case against default effect sizes in sport and exercise science

Aaron Caldwell, Andrew D. Vigotsky

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10314 PubMed 33194448

June 27, 2018

Methods matter: the relationship between strength and hypertrophy depends on methods of measurement and analysis

Andrew D. Vigotsky, Brad J. Schoenfeld, Christian Than, J. Mark Brown

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5071 PubMed 29967737

August 11, 2016

The modified Thomas test is not a valid measure of hip extension unless pelvic tilt is controlled

Andrew D. Vigotsky, Gregory J. Lehman, Chris Beardsley, Bret Contreras, Bryan Chung, Erin H. Feser

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2325 PubMed 27602291

November 30, 2015

Biomechanical implications of skeletal muscle hypertrophy and atrophy: a musculoskeletal model

Andrew D. Vigotsky, Bret Contreras, Chris Beardsley

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1462 PubMed 26644989

October 27, 2015

Differences in unilateral chest press muscle activation and kinematics on a stable versus unstable surface while holding one versus two dumbbells

Jeffrey M. Patterson, Andrew D. Vigotsky, Nicole E. Oppenheimer, Erin H. Feser

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1365 PubMed 26528421

September 24, 2015

Acute effects of anterior thigh foam rolling on hip angle, knee angle, and rectus femoris length in the modified Thomas test

Andrew D. Vigotsky, Gregory J. Lehman, Bret Contreras, Chris Beardsley, Bryan Chung, Erin H. Feser

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1281 PubMed 26421244

September 22, 2015

A comparison of two gluteus maximus EMG maximum voluntary isometric contraction positions

Bret Contreras, Andrew D. Vigotsky, Brad J. Schoenfeld, Chris Beardsley, John Cronin

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1261 PubMed 26417543

January 6, 2015

Effects of load on good morning kinematics and EMG activity

Andrew David Vigotsky, Erin Nicole Harper, David Russell Ryan, Bret Contreras

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.708 PubMed 25653899

June 5, 2015 - Version: 2

The neurophysiological response to manual therapy and its analgesic implications: A narrative review

Andrew D Vigotsky, Ryan P Bruhns

https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.996v2

Signed reviews submitted for articles published in PeerJ Note that some articles may not have the review itself made public unless authors have made them open as well.

May 29, 2019

Unilateral hamstring foam rolling does not impair strength but the rate of force development of the contralateral muscle

Xin Ye, Benjamin S. Killen, Krista L. Zelizney, William M. Miller, Sunggun Jeon

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7028 PubMed 31179197

April 20, 2018

The reliability of vertical jump tests between the Vertec and My Jump phone application

Vanessa R. Yingling, Dimitri A. Castro, Justin T. Duong, Fiorella J. Malpartida, Justin R. Usher, Jenny O

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4669 PubMed 29692955

August 23, 2016

Reliability and validity of an iPhone^® application for the measurement of lumbar spine flexion and extension range of motion

Mohammad Reza Pourahmadi, Morteza Taghipour, Elham Jannati, Mohammad Ali Mohseni-Bandpei, Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani, Fatemeh Rajabzadeh

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2355 PubMed 27635328

1 Answer

Do you believe the methods described in the paper would be suitable for athletic men?