Editor rating: 8 / 10Antonio Palazón-Bru –– A paper to determine that the Spanish version of this test is useful for clinical practice.
Section Editor rating: 8 / 10Stephen Macknik –– The editor and reviewers are enthusiastic.
Editor rating: 8 / 10Mario Negrello –– This article advances of our understanding of motor synergies with a well quantified case of motor abundance, clear methods and meaningful results. It uses uncontrolled manifold analysis (UCM) to model and quantify motor abundance, and provides support for the interesting idea that neural systems help shape motor abundance.
Editor rating: 8 / 10Kevin Black –– The authors do real science here, following up on an initial finding from a pilot study and reporting the outcome appropriately. That may sound obvious, but in the real world of research these days it is a delightful breath of fresh hair.
Editor rating: 9 / 10Jafri Abdullah –– the number of clusters have always been debatable,
Editor rating: 8 / 10Tjeerd Boonstra –– The article re-examines the results of an influential paper and challenges the idea that social media data analysed on a county-level may provide a reliable predictor of health outcomes. The authors raise several questions on the reliability of data and study design that need to be addressed for this field going forward.
Editor rating: 8 / 10Andrew Gray –– Causality is one of the most important principles in research, but also one that is often misunderstood in particular contexts. This article provides an important warning that in our attempts as authors to provide candidate reasons for our observational research findings, we may be inadvertently encouraging our readers to believe that there is a true causal link (rather than simply an association) at play. If these results are replicated in other domains and settings, this will provide a foundation and strong motivation for testing approaches to reduce the risk that evidence from observational studies is over-interpreted, both by other researchers and by the public.
Section Editor rating: 8 / 10Stephen Macknik –– The reviewers and editors all agree that this is high impact.
Section Editor rating: 8 / 10Stephen Macknik –– This study reveals a potential novel mechanistic pathway in ptsd, a major health concern
Section Editor rating: 8 / 10Stephen Macknik –– Looks really relevant to all fields of science and STEM.
Discussing these articles