Editor rating: 7 / 10Joao Rocha –– In this theoretical paper, the authors have calculated the safe occupational distance for transcranial magnetic stimulation. Of importance, they have indcated the use of a more conservative distance (0.96-1.46 m) instead of 0.7 m found in the literature.
Section Editor rating: 8 / 10Stephen Macknik –– The reviewers and editors all agree that this is high impact.
Editor rating: 7 / 10Paul Tulkens –– I give a nice overview of what is a well known but often unmet medical and societal problem. It may contribute to come closer to improving the situation in the future.
Section Editor rating: 6 / 10Stephen Macknik –– Addiction research is a high-impact field.
Section Editor rating: 8 / 10Stephen Macknik –– This study reveals a potential novel mechanistic pathway in ptsd, a major health concern
Section Editor rating: 8 / 10Stephen Macknik –– Looks really relevant to all fields of science and STEM.
Section Editor rating: 8 / 10Stephen Macknik –– I believe this paper will be widely read
Editor rating: 9 / 10Jafri Abdullah –– Receptor studies are the blue ocean for future drugs that will cure brain,mind and neurological diseases
Editor rating: 6 / 10Luca Tommasi –– It is a nice small study that has the potential to be appreciated by the "multisensory community"
Editor rating: 6 / 10Salvatore Andrea Mastrolia –– Interesting manuscript regarding an issue with high social impact
Discussing these articles