Editor rating: 8 / 10Kevin Black –– The authors do real science here, following up on an initial finding from a pilot study and reporting the outcome appropriately. That may sound obvious, but in the real world of research these days it is a delightful breath of fresh hair.
Editor rating: 6 / 10Anthony Barnhart –– This paper is one of the first to explore the limits of Saccade-Induced Retrieval Enhancement and its relationship with multiple memory systems.
Editor rating: 9 / 10Jafri Abdullah –– the number of clusters have always been debatable,
Editor rating: 8 / 10Tjeerd Boonstra –– The article re-examines the results of an influential paper and challenges the idea that social media data analysed on a county-level may provide a reliable predictor of health outcomes. The authors raise several questions on the reliability of data and study design that need to be addressed for this field going forward.
Editor rating: 6 / 10Maria Concetta Geloso –– The article provides new experimental tools to explore alterations of neurotransmission which are frequently involved in neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric diseases.
Section Editor rating: 7 / 10Claire Fletcher-Flinn –– I agree with the reviewers comments re causality.
Editor rating: 6 / 10Kevin Black –– The authors provide a simple set of tasks that, collectively, activate a large fraction of brain regions in BOLD fMRI. They further provide the code and their analysis results, to facilitate adoption of these tasks.
Section Editor rating: 7 / 10Stephen Macknik –– This advance will potentially have significant impact in diagnosis and therapeutic tracking for mild cognitive impairment.
Editor rating: 7 / 10Tjeerd Boonstra –– The paper further enhances our understanding of muscle mechanics and muscular contraction
Editor rating: 7 / 10Jafri Abdullah –– Methodology looks interesting and reproducible
Discussing these articles