Editor rating: 8 / 10Dorothy Bishop –– On the one hand, it raises questions about a high-profile paper that has been the subject of considerable debate. But I think the statistical points made have considerably more application than to this one case, and the general issues raised about methods are important for the field. This is a highly technical paper that will only be understood by a minority of readers, but the inclusion of scripts to illustrate the different methods of analysis in the context of simulated data will be very helpful to anyone wishing to learn about this area
Editor rating: 7 / 10Lucy Troup –– It attempts to define the measurement process of mood disorders more objectively
Editor rating: 7 / 10Anthony Jorm –– This is a very new technology for assessing behavior change in depression.
Editor rating: 7 / 10Richard Morris –– Understanding the "dimensions" of stigma is important.
Editor rating: 8 / 10Louise Barrett –– It uses a novel network methodology to address questions of broad interest to those who study social animals.
Editor rating: 8 / 10Jafri Abdullah –– Mental Health is top priority for research in many countries and this paper will be cited soon.
Editor rating: 7 / 10Jafri Abdullah –– Interesting important cognitive test
Editor rating: 7 / 10Luciano Fadiga –– the dimension of the sample gives to this work a particular relevance
Editor rating: 7 / 10Jennifer Vonk –– The authors are attempting to identify mechanisms by which songbirds may alter their songs as a function of urban environments. The results speak to plasticity and impact of the human environment on indigenous species.
Editor rating: 8 / 10Walter de Azevedo Jr. –– It brings new findings about AChE inhibition, which may contribute to design a new generation of AChE inhibitors.
Discussing these articles