Javascript is disabled in your browser. Please enable Javascript to view PeerJ.

Find your section in PeerJ List Summary Impact analytics

Brain and Cognition

Article commentary

21 September 2018

Does Twitter language reliably predict heart disease? A commentary on Eichstaedt et al. (2015a)

Nicholas J.L. Brown, James C. Coyne

Editor rating: 8 / 10

Tjeerd Boonstra –– The article re-examines the results of an influential paper and challenges the idea that social media data analysed on a county-level may provide a reliable predictor of health outcomes. The authors raise several questions on the reliability of data and study design that need to be addressed for this field going forward.

12 September 2018

Explanation of observational data engenders a causal belief about smoking and cancer

Section Editor rating: 7 / 10

Claire Fletcher-Flinn –– I agree with the reviewers comments re causality.

5 September 2018

Episodix: a serious game to detect cognitive impairment in senior adults. A psychometric study

Section Editor rating: 7 / 10

Stephen Macknik –– This advance will potentially have significant impact in diagnosis and therapeutic tracking for mild cognitive impairment.

The influence of residual force enhancement on spinal and supraspinal excitability

Editor rating: 7 / 10

Tjeerd Boonstra –– The paper further enhances our understanding of muscle mechanics and muscular contraction

A computer-based avatar task designed to assess behavioral inhibition extends to behavioral avoidance but not cognitive avoidance

Editor rating: 7 / 10

Jafri Abdullah –– Methodology looks interesting and reproducible

Illusory resizing of the painful knee is analgesic in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis

Section Editor rating: 7 / 10

Stephen Macknik –– The use of illusory size changes to body parts—as an analgesic method—is amazing and new. The public will take notice.

Assessing metacognitive beliefs about worry: validation of German versions of the Why Worry Scale II and the Consequences of Worry Scale

Editor rating: 7 / 10

Antonio Palazón-Bru –– A scientific evidence to use the German version of the analyzed questionnaire.

Safe exposure distances for transcranial magnetic stimulation based on computer simulations

Editor rating: 7 / 10

Joao Rocha –– In this theoretical paper, the authors have calculated the safe occupational distance for transcranial magnetic stimulation. Of importance, they have indcated the use of a more conservative distance (0.96-1.46 m) instead of 0.7 m found in the literature.

Why is nonword reading so variable in adult skilled readers?

Section Editor rating: 8 / 10

Stephen Macknik –– The reviewers and editors all agree that this is high impact.

Potentially inappropriate use of benzodiazepines and z-drugs in the older population—analysis of associations between long-term use and patient-related factors

Editor rating: 7 / 10

Paul Tulkens –– I give a nice overview of what is a well known but often unmet medical and societal problem. It may contribute to come closer to improving the situation in the future.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Next

Academic Editors

Average h-index of Editorial Board: 39

Abdullah

Kubke

Coyne

Kronfol

Collingridge

Mechelli

Damasio

Lasmezas

van Os

Perry

Soares

Holstein

Giugliano

Ben-Ari

Wisden

Morrison

Kowall

Vezzani