Section Editor rating: 7 / 10Robert Toonen –– I defer to the editor who is more familiar with this field than I am.
Editor rating: 6 / 10Jörg Oehlmann –– Important findings for marine zoology
Section Editor rating: 6 / 10James Reimer –– An example of using simulation to examine underwater survey bias in different methods - the ideas here could be used to examine other survey types as well.
Editor rating: 6 / 10John Berges –– Length-weight and other morphometric relationships are important tools for understanding and managing fisheries populations. This manuscript adds data for critical life stages for an under-studied group.
Editor rating: 6 / 10Marcia Marques –– The long monitoring period is a positive aspect of this investigation.
Section Editor rating: 6 / 10Robert Toonen –– I agree with the AE
Section Editor rating: 7 / 10James Reimer –– As mentioned by the Associate Editor and reviewers, studies of this nature over a long-term period are quite rare.
Editor rating: 7 / 10Mohammad Shamsur Rahman –– DNA extraction is always crucial for the subsequent analyses; so this work will help the researchers' to work with shrimp microbiota.
Section Editor rating: 7 / 10James Reimer –– As stated by a reviewer and the editor - a nice piece of science examining changes in the diet of a bird species when their food source(s) are compromised by negative anthropogenic impacts, in this case stream acidification.
Section Editor rating: 7 / 10Robert Toonen –– The editor is more qualified than I am and I defer to his evaluation on this one.
Discussing these articles