PeerJ, the journal, is now divided into separate Sections by field.
Section Editors have oversight of their section to ensure the journal maintains a fair peer review process and the highest standards of scientific practice in their fields.
Within each Section, the Academic Editors regularly identify and highlight the most important new PeerJ publications in their field. Learn more & Meet the Section Editors.
Section Editor rating: 7 / 10Elena Papaleo –– An interesting solution to identify a subset of reference genes for qualitative qPCR of cancer samples
Editor rating: 7 / 10Anastazia Banaszak –– There are few studies on species within turbid reef environments.
Editor rating: 8 / 10Konstantinos Kormas –– A very good effort on putting together and analysing shrimp gut microbiota.
Editor rating: 7 / 10Maria Cristina Albertini –– I believe that prebiotics may have an important influence of immune response. More information are needed on intestinal barrier functions and this paper can be of support.
Editor rating: 7 / 10Leonardo Montagnani –– I believe that the scientific question the authors are addressing is relevant. However, there are some problems with the sampling scheme.
At the moment sections are unavailable for environmental science and medical subjects. See subject pages instead.