PeerJ, the journal, is now divided into separate Sections by field.
Section Editors have oversight of their section to ensure the journal maintains a fair peer review process and the highest standards of scientific practice in their fields.
Within each Section, the Academic Editors regularly identify and highlight the most important new PeerJ publications in their field. Learn more & Meet the Section Editors.
Editor rating: 7 / 10Carlos Conte-Junior –– This article is relevant to food science and technology.
Editor rating: 7 / 10Paul Tulkens –– Benzodiazepines are among the most abused drugs and associated with severe but often not well recognized side effects. They also induce a marked dependence. This paper may help in better appreciating the risks of benzodiazepines and to mitigate their overuse.
Editor rating: 7 / 10Michael Wink –– Use of UCE is a novel approach
Editor rating: 7 / 10Joseph Craine –– The authors provide an in-depth analysis of the microbial assemblages during decomposition in an under-researched system. These are sophisticated techniques that are helping to fundamentally change our understanding of microbial decomposition.
Editor rating: 7 / 10Tomas Hrbek –– A useful and for many probably a necessary overview of the complexities of structuring and origins of Neotropical biodiversity, and the need to pursue cross-disciplinary approaches if we hope to understand Neotropical biodiversity.
At the moment sections are unavailable for environmental science and medical subjects. See subject pages instead.