[Experimental] List of manuscripts available for review volunteers
1 manuscript available for review volunteers
December 22, 2017
The cold-climate hypothesis is the main and most supported explanation of the evolution of viviparity among reptiles. This hypothesis sustains that viviparity arose as a means to save eggs from an increased mortality in nests linked with low temperatures. In this sense, some authors have stated that viviparity could constitute an evolutionary constraint. However, the link between evolutionary constraints and the evolution of ecological niches has not been well studied. Here, we study the climatic niche evolution of a group of viviparous lizards from North America to test whether the diversification of the group is linked with Phylogenetic Niche Conservatism (PNC). We evaluated phylogenetic signals and trait evolution, besides a reconstruction of ancestral climate tolerances, and did not find PNC in the ecological niche of the species in the group. Surprisingly, we did not find conservatism in any bioclimatic variables associated with temperature; we only had evidence of conservatism in Precipitation Seasonality (Bio15) and Precipitation of Coldest Quarter (Bio19). Analysis of relative disparity through time (DTT) indicates high divergence around 4.0 MYA and 0.65 MYA that coincides with orogenic and glacial periods. There is no evidence that climatic niche differentiation was the main factor in the diversification of the studied group. Orogenic and glacial periods probably promote cycles of the availability of new territories and isolation, which could promote the rapid accumulation of ecological differences between the species of the group.

FAQs

Is this open peer review?

No, peer review is still single-blind and all recommendations are private between the authors and Academic Editor. However, any reviewer has the option to sign their report, and once accepted for publication then that review can be shown publicly - again this is optional.

Will I be guaranteed to review if I volunteer?

No. Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. This is for many reasons. For one, reviewers must have relevant qualifications for any manuscript and void of any conflicts of interest. Additionally, it could be that enough reviewers have accepted an invitation to review already, in which case we would not invite any more.

Why aren't there more manuscripts available?

Manuscripts are shown when authors have opted-in for obtaining reviewers through the reviewer-match service. Additionally, there may already be enough reviewers found through other means, for example, invitations sent by the Academic Editor in charge.

What are the editorial criteria?

Please visit the editorial criteria page for initial guidance. You will also be given additional information if invited to review.