[Experimental] List of manuscripts available for review volunteers
2 manuscripts available for review volunteers
January 12, 2018
Parkinson’s disease is a widespread condition caused by degeneration of dopamine neurons in the midbrain. A number of proteins are known to be important to signalling mechanisms present in the midbrain during natural dopamine neuron development, and may be utilised to better produce dopamine neurons in vitro. Relative expression levels of proteins were obtained from substantia nigra tissue of rats from embryonic days E11 through E14 using isobaric tagging for relative and absolute quantification. This project analysed the dataset obtained, with an emphasis on relative expression levels of proteins across the four-day period. Bioinformatics searching of online databases reduced the dataset from 3325 proteins to a shortlist of five worthy of further investigation. It is hoped that the proteins identified using these techniques will help to refine protocols for the production of dopamine neurons in vitro.
December 12, 2017

Background. Freemartinism is a condition generally occurring in the female offspring of dizygotic twins in a mixed-sex pregnancy. Most domestic animals such as bovine, sheep, goat and pig in this condition are sterile, but still about 15% of bovine heterosexual twin females are fertile. However, farmers in China culled almost all bovine fertile heterosexual twin females directly due to lack of practical diagnostic approach, resulting in substantial economic and genetic-material losses both for Chinese dairy and beef industry.

Methods. In this study, a comparative test, including qualitative detection of SRY gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), quantitative detection of relative content of SRY by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and quantitative detection of H-Y antigen, was conducted to confirm the most accurate diagnosis for freemartin. Twelve Holstein heterosexual twin females were selected for this study, with three normal Holstein bulls and three normal Holstein cows served as positive and negative control, respectively.

Results. PCR results showed that three heterosexual twin females were absent of SRY gene whereas only two of them were subsequently verified as fertile. The qPCR results showed that relative content of SRY was over 14.2% in freemartin and below 0.41% in fertile heterosexual twin females. The H-Y antigen test showed no significant numerical differences between freemartin and fertile heterosexual twin female.

Discussion. Our results show that relative content of SRY quantified by qPCR, rather than qualitative detection of SRY gene by PCR or quantitative detection of H-Y antigen, is the most accurate method for diagnosis of freemartin in Holstein cattle. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first time we applied qPCR to diagnosing freemartin by quantifying SRY gene and got the relative SRY content of each freemartin and fertile heterosexual twin female. We declare for the first time that it is the content of SRY gene, rather than its presence or absence, that determines the fertility of a heterosexual twin female.


Is this open peer review?

No, peer review is still single-blind and all recommendations are private between the authors and Academic Editor. However, any reviewer has the option to sign their report, and once accepted for publication then that review can be shown publicly - again this is optional.

Will I be guaranteed to review if I volunteer?

No. Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. This is for many reasons. For one, reviewers must have relevant qualifications for any manuscript and void of any conflicts of interest. Additionally, it could be that enough reviewers have accepted an invitation to review already, in which case we would not invite any more.

Why aren't there more manuscripts available?

Manuscripts are shown when authors have opted-in for obtaining reviewers through the reviewer-match service. Additionally, there may already be enough reviewers found through other means, for example, invitations sent by the Academic Editor in charge.

What are the editorial criteria?

Please visit the editorial criteria page for initial guidance. You will also be given additional information if invited to review.