[Experimental] List of manuscripts available for review volunteers
1 manuscript available for review volunteers
February 6, 2017

Objective: The trabecular meshwork (TM) is the primary substrate of outflow resistance in glaucomatous eyes. Repopulating diseased TM with fresh, functional TM cells might represent a novel therapeutic breakthrough. Various decellularized TM scaffolds were developed by ablating existing cells with suicide gene therapy or saponin, but always with incomplete cell removal or dissolve the extracellular matrix. We hypothesized that a chemical-free, freeze-thaw method would be able to produce a fully decellularized TM scaffold for cell transplantation.

Materials and Methods: We obtained 24 porcine eyes from a local abattoir, dissected and mounted them in an anterior segment perfusion and pressure transduction system within two hours of sacrifice. After they stabilized for 72 hours, eight eyes each were assigned to freeze-thaw (F) ablation (-80°C×2), to 0.02% saponin (S) treatment, or the control group (C), respectively. The trabecular meshwork was transduced with an eGFP expressing feline immunodeficiency viral (FIV) vector and tracked via fluorescent microscopy to confirm ablation. Following treatment, the eyes were perfused with standard tissue culture medium for 180 hours. We assessed histological changes by hematoxylin and eosin staining. TM cell viability was evaluated with a calcein AM/propidium iodide (PI) assay. We measured IOP and modeled it with a linear mixed effects model using a B-spline function of time with 5 degrees of freedom.

Results: F and S experienced a similar IOP reduction by 30% from baseline (P=0.64). IOP reduction of about 30% occurred in F within 24 hours and in S within 48 hours. Live visualization of eGFP demonstrated that F conferred a complete ablation of all TM cells and only a partial ablation in S. Histological analysis confirmed that no TM cells survived in F while the extracellular matrix remained. The viability assay showed very low PI and no calcein staining in F in contrast to numerous PI-labeled dead TM cells and calcein-labeled viable TM cells in S.

Conclusion: We developed a rapid TM ablation method that uses cyclic freezing that is free of biological or chemical agents and able to produce a decellularized TM scaffold with preserved TM extracellular matrix in an organotypic perfusion culture.


Is this open peer review?

No, peer review is still single-blind and all recommendations are private between the authors and Academic Editor. However, any reviewer has the option to sign their report, and once accepted for publication then that review can be shown publicly - again this is optional.

Will I be guaranteed to review if I volunteer?

No. Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. This is for many reasons. For one, reviewers must have relevant qualifications for any manuscript and void of any conflicts of interest. Additionally, it could be that enough reviewers have accepted an invitation to review already, in which case we would not invite any more.

Why aren't there more manuscripts available?

Manuscripts are shown when authors have opted-in for obtaining reviewers through the reviewer-match service. Additionally, there may already be enough reviewers found through other means, for example, invitations sent by the Academic Editor in charge.

What are the editorial criteria?

Please visit the editorial criteria page for initial guidance. You will also be given additional information if invited to review.