[Experimental] List of manuscripts available for review volunteers
1 manuscript available for review volunteers
December 7, 2017
This paper reviews some of the foundations and upshots of climate change on fisheries and aquaculture productivity in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and the implications for food security. It further highlights possible measures for adaptation and mitigation of the impacts and this is borne out of the need for urgent attention and further inquiry into the relationship between climate change and fish food security in the region. Though fish is the most important source of cheap, quality animal protein, it is grossly insufficient in most SSA diets. To guarantee the nutritional well-being of its population, a consistent supply of fish is essential. However, the region ranks high in terms of susceptibility to climate change amidst several challenges bedeviling fish production and this further threatens its efficacy. Therefore, to achieve effective management of fisheries and aquaculture through adaptation and mitigation in the face of climate fluctuations and change, it is quintessential for stakeholders to drive co-management methodologies which comprise the livelihoods, ecosystem-based and community-based approaches which are deemed to positively impact the four dimensions of food security thus contributing to the achievement of a climate friendly and food secure economy.

FAQs

Is this open peer review?

No, peer review is still single-blind and all recommendations are private between the authors and Academic Editor. However, any reviewer has the option to sign their report, and once accepted for publication then that review can be shown publicly - again this is optional.

Will I be guaranteed to review if I volunteer?

No. Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. This is for many reasons. For one, reviewers must have relevant qualifications for any manuscript and void of any conflicts of interest. Additionally, it could be that enough reviewers have accepted an invitation to review already, in which case we would not invite any more.

Why aren't there more manuscripts available?

Manuscripts are shown when authors have opted-in for obtaining reviewers through the reviewer-match service. Additionally, there may already be enough reviewers found through other means, for example, invitations sent by the Academic Editor in charge.

What are the editorial criteria?

Please visit the editorial criteria page for initial guidance. You will also be given additional information if invited to review.