FuMoE-csKT: Fusing disentangled and Self-Attention in a Personalized mixture-of-experts framework for Cold-Start Knowledge Tracing


Abstract

Knowledge Tracing (KT) aims to model a student’s evolving mastery of knowledge components(KCs) by leveraging their historical interaction records. However, in real-world online learning systems, a cold-start problem inevitably arises when new students enter the system with limited interaction data. Despite the emergence of numerous deep learning-based KT models, effectively addressing cold-start scenarios remains a persistent and significant challenge. In this paper, we fuse disentangled and self-attention in a personalized mixture-of-experts framework for cold-start knowledge tracing(FuMoE-csKT). At the core of our approach is a fused attention mechanism that combines disentangled attention and self-attention within a unified module, further enhanced by a learnable kernel bias function. This design significantly improves the model's capacity for sequence modeling and temporal robustness, especially in capturing multi-dimensional relations in short interaction sequences. To further promote representation diversity and personalization, the output of the attention module is passed through a soft Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) layer, where multiple expert networks are softly selected via a gating mechanism. This expert-level diversity allows the model to adaptively learn from varied student behavior patterns, even under severe data sparsity. We conduct comprehensive evaluations of FuMoE-csKT on four real-world educational datasets under cold-start conditions, leveraging two widely-used evaluation metrics, the Area Under the Curve (AUC) and Accuracy (ACC). The results showed that the proposed framework consistently outperforms existing baselines in most cases. Additionally, we perform thorough ablation studies and efficiency analyses to validate the effectiveness and robustness of our framework.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ Computer Science does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].