Bitcoin’s sentiment spillover effect and hybrid CNN-LSTM framework for cryptocurrency price forecasting


Abstract

This paper focuses on investigating how sentiments extracted from news surrounding Bitcoin affect other major cryptocurrencies, and on using Bitcoin sentiments along with other features to predict the price of these assets. Since Bitcoin is the market leader and several studies have shown the interconnectedness of the cryptocurrency market, understanding and quantifying the effect of Bitcoin-related sentiment on other coins can provide new insights for investors and traders, as well as expand the horizon of trading signals. After applying statistical tests, we found that sentiment affects different cryptocurrencies in different ways and across various market regimes. In particular, Ethereum demonstrated a bidirectional relationship with Bitcoin sentiment, while Solana reacted almost instantly, and XRP displayed a delayed response. Building on these results, we developed a deep learning model based on a hybrid CNN–LSTM architecture, using Bitcoin sentiment, Bitcoin features, Solana features, and their interactions to predict Solana’s price. Lagged features were used in some combinations with other attributes. Through experimentation with different lookback windows and forecast horizons, one of the models, called Model 5, achieved the strongest results, recording the lowest errors overall (MSE = 255.35, MAE = 12.01). Notably, it employed the shortest lookback configuration (24 h CNN, 72 h LSTM). This framework, which focuses on extracting market conditions from Bitcoin sentiment and features while incorporating asset-specific reactions, offers a unique way of integrating broader market signals into predictive models of major cryptocurrencies.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ Computer Science does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].