0

The topology of this tree, which – confirming our 2008 plastid tree – shows several deep incongruences with the nuclear-based species trees (ITS-based, Grimm et al. 2006, or phylogenomic: Li et al. 2019), devalidates your follow-up paper published in Genomics a year later, where you base all analyses on the combined nuclear(435kbp)-plastid(150kpb) data set.

Given the here shown results and...

…read more, vote or answer

topological conflict
•
waiting for moderation