0
Erratum, correction

Instead of Formula (6), the fit as described in the R script to generate Fig. 1 should be adhered to.

…read more, vote or answer

Erratum correction
Tessa Pronk • 263
• 10 May 2016 3:33pm
edited 2016-05-10T15:40:56+00:00
waiting for moderation
0
Erratum, correction

Instead of Formula (6), the publication rates as assigned in the R script to generate Fig. 3 should be adhered to.

…read more, vote or answer

Erratum correction
Tessa Pronk • 263
• 10 May 2016 3:30pm
edited 2016-05-10T15:41:41+00:00
waiting for moderation
-1
Erratum, correction

Formula (6) is erroneous and should be ignored altogether. This correction does not affect results. In the R scripts used to generate the fitted line in Fig. 1 and for generating a publication rate per researcher for Fig. 3, correct notations were used.

…read more, vote or answer

erratum correction
Tessa Pronk • 263
• 10 May 2016 3:27pm
edited 2016-05-10T15:48:25+00:00
waiting for moderation