0
Instead of Formula (6), the fit as described in the R script to generate Fig. 1 should be adhered to.
…read more, vote or answer
waiting for moderation
Instead of Formula (6), the fit as described in the R script to generate Fig. 1 should be adhered to.
…read more, vote or answerInstead of Formula (6), the publication rates as assigned in the R script to generate Fig. 3 should be adhered to.
…read more, vote or answerFormula (6) is erroneous and should be ignored altogether. This correction does not affect results. In the R scripts used to generate the fitted line in Fig. 1 and for generating a publication rate per researcher for Fig. 3, correct notations were used.
…read more, vote or answer