0

I don't think "quality of the journal" makes sense for mega-journals, because they are functionally repositories for papers. There is (often) no editorial policy, or orientation of the journal towards specific topics.

-
waiting for moderation
2 Answers
0
Accepted answer

Paul, it was defined by the respondents. They were simply asked how important quality was in their decision to publish in the journal. I think most researchers have a sense of the quality of the journals in their field.

waiting for moderation
0
Accepted answer

I'd say it's defined by the type of editors and people running the journal! ;)

waiting for moderation