0
Is there something amiss with this figure and heading?
Viewed 78 times

I think that there's something wrong with this figure and heading. The heading refers to graphs A, A, C, and D. Also, I think that (C) should be Cicindela nevadica lincolniana, not the second (A) as currently indicated. (B) should be C. fulgida.

In addition, the species listed at graph (C) is "C. n. nevadica", but I think that it's supposed to be Cicindela nevadica lincolniana.

There seem to be similar, but slightly different, issues with Figure 4 and its heading as well.

In figure 2, the graphs seem to correspond to the species (or so I assume), but the figure heading again seems to be incorrect. The A,B,C,D don't match between the heading and the figure.

waiting for moderation