Why are the results of Forest et al. 2005 and Grimm and Renner 2013 ignored?
Viewed 20 times
It is a poor argument for phylogenomic tree inference, when one has to cite long outdated (pre-2000) phylogenies based on morphology alone or single genes (Pre-2000, molecular phylogenetics were in their infancy, and many trees of that time where quickly refined or rejected).
waiting for moderation