0
How can the economic values be different if the mineralization rates were not different?

Here it says that there were no significant differences in the removal rates/mineralization, but then in the Abstract, under results, you say "The economic values of the two selected ES were greater for the organic systems in all four crops." It looks like only one of the ES was greater in the organic fields.

waiting for moderation
1 Answer
0
Accepted answer

We found no significant difference in the mineralisation rates in organic and conventional fields. However, the economic value was calculated by using equation 1, that includes N in soil, bulk density and volume of soil in top 10 cm apart from mineralisation rate. Although the range was slightly higher for the economic value in organic fields but there was no statistically significant difference for N min economic value. The combined economic value in organic fields was higher as stated in the paper.

waiting for moderation
0

How can you say both "The economic values of the two selected ES were greater for the organic systems in all four crops." and "there was no statistically significant difference for N min economic value."?

-
waiting for moderation