Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Guala et al MSW '15 POSTER

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.983v2/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Ivan Guala conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ljiljana Iveša performed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Patrik Krstinić performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Zrinka Jakl performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Milena Šijan performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Mosor Prvan performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Maya Sertic performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Matea Špika performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Vedran Nikolić conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ante Žuljević performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ivan Cvitković performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Giuseppe Di Carlo conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Željka Rajković conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Funding

This work was funded by the RAC/SPA MedMPAnet Project (Memorandum of Understanding N°01/MedMPAnet/2013). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies