Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

There are no competing interests on this project.

Author Contributions

Orian Tzadik conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ethan Goddard performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

David J Hollander contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Christopher Koenig contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper, guidance on methodology.

Christopher D. Stallings conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

1. Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), Division of Research Integrity and Compliance, University of South Florida

2. 4193W

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

1. Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

2. SAL-13-1244A-SRP; F/SER24:PH

Funding

This study was supported by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration through a MARFIN award to C.C. Koenig and C.D. Stallings (NA11NMF4330123) and a Marine Resource Assessment Fellowship to the senior author (NA10NMF4550468). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies