Mapping the collaboration networks of biomedical research in Southeast Asia

University of the Philippine Manila, UP Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.936v1
Subject Areas
Statistics, Computational Science
Keywords
co-authorship networks, bibliometrics, social network analysis, network centrality
Copyright
© 2015 Malbas
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ PrePrints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Malbas VSR. 2015. Mapping the collaboration networks of biomedical research in Southeast Asia. PeerJ PrePrints 3:e936v1

Abstract

Collaboration forms an integral aspect of global research endeavors, where co-authorship derived from bibliographic records provides the building block for mapping research collaboration networks. Bibliometric techniques and social network analysis tools were applied to measure the scope and depth of collaboration in biomedical research in Southeast Asia during the period 2005-2009. In particular, centrality scores and draw network maps were calculated for both country and institutional levels of aggregation. In the field of biomedical research, Thailand and Singapore are the most productive and collaborative countries in Southeast Asia during the period studied. Using network analysis, there was strong correlation of research productivity by a country or institution with the number of collaboration and its group influence, and weak correlation with maximal data flow within the research network. There were specific clusters of connected institutions in subnetworks for neoplasm, diabetes, and tuberculosis research. Given the observed frequency of regional collaboration in Southeast Asia, in comparison to foreign collaboration, it is argued that increasing the number of collaborations within Southeast Asia will help advance the region’s efforts on domestic and regional health issues.

Author Comment

This paper will be submitted to PeerJ for review. Initial feedback to this preprint may be coursed through the correspondence indicated.