Development of a cognitive bias methodology for measuring depression-like mood in chimpanzees
- Published
- Accepted
- Subject Areas
- Animal Behavior, Psychiatry and Psychology
- Keywords
- cognitive bias, judgment bias, affective state, chimpanzee, depression, animal welfare, psychopathology
- Copyright
- © 2015 Bateson et al.
- Licence
- This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ PrePrints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
- Cite this article
- 2015. Development of a cognitive bias methodology for measuring depression-like mood in chimpanzees. PeerJ PrePrints 3:e888v1 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.888v1
Abstract
There is an ethical and scientific need for objective, well-validated measures of depression-like mood in captive chimpanzees. We describe the development of a novel cognitive task designed to measure ‘pessimistic’ bias in judgments of expectation of reward, a cognitive marker of depressed mood previously validated in a wide range of species, and report training and test data from three common chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes). The chimpanzees were trained on an arbitrary visual discrimination in which lifting a pale grey paper cone was associated with reinforcement with a peanut, whereas lifting a dark grey cone was associated with no reward. The discrimination was trained by sequentially presenting the two cone types until significant differences in latency to touch the cone types emerged, and was confirmed by simultaneously presenting both cone types inchoice trials. Subjects were subsequently tested on their latency to touch unrewarded cones of three intermediate shades of grey not previously seen. Pessimism was indicated by the similarity between the latency to touch intermediate cones and the latency to touch the trained, unreinforced, dark grey cones. Three subjects completed training and testing, two adult males and one adult female. All subjects learnt the discrimination (107-240 trials), and retained it during five sessions of testing. There was no evidence that latencies to lift intermediate cones increased over testing, as would have occurred if subjects learnt that these were never rewarded, suggesting that the task could be used for repeated testing of individual animals. There was a significant difference between subjects in their relative latencies to touch intermediate cones (pessimism index) that emerged following the second test session, and was not changed by the addition of further data. The most dominant male subject was least pessimistic, and the female most pessimistic, suggesting a possible correlation between social dominance and pessimism that would need to be confirmed with data from further subjects.
Author Comment
This article is currently submitted to PeerJ for review.