Co-father relationships among the Suruí (Paiter) of Brazil

Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
Fondation Thiers, Laboratoire d’Anthropologie Sociale (CNRS), Paris, France
School of Education, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.843v2
Subject Areas
Anthropology
Keywords
multiple fathers, Partible paternity, reproductive strategies, cooperative breeding, Amazonia
Copyright
© 2015 Walker et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ PrePrints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Walker RS, Yvinec C, Ellsworth RM, Bailey DH. 2015. Co-father relationships among the Suruí (Paiter) of Brazil. PeerJ PrePrints 3:e843v2

Abstract

Partible paternity refers to the conception belief that children can have multiple fathers (“co-fathers”) and is common to indigenous cultures of lowland South America. The nature of social relationships observed between co-fathers reveals information about the reproductive strategies underlying partible paternity. Here we analyze clan, genealogical, and social relationships between co-fathers for the Suruí, an indigenous horticultural population in Brazil. We show that co-fathers roughly assort into two separate categories. In the affiliative category, co-father relationships are amicable when they are between close kin, namely brothers and father-son. In the competitive category, relationships are more likely of avoidance or open hostility when between more distant kin such as cousins or unrelated men of different clans. Results therefore imply multiple types of relationships, including both cooperative and competitive contexts, under the rubric of partible paternity. These complexities of partible paternity institutions add to our knowledge of the full range of cross-cultural variation in human mating/marriage arrangements and speak to the debate on whether or not humans should be classified as cooperative breeders.

Author Comment

This is a manuscript under a second round of review at PeerJ.