The fragile legacy of Amphicoelias fragillimus (Dinosauria: Sauropoda; Morrison Formation - Latest Jurassic)

Museum of the Rockies and Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA
Museum of Moab, Moab, Utah, USA
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.838v1
Subject Areas
Paleontology
Keywords
Amphicoelias fragillimus, E. D. Cope, sauropod, gigantism
Copyright
© 2015 Woodruff et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ PrePrints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Woodruff C, Foster JR. 2015. The fragile legacy of Amphicoelias fragillimus (Dinosauria: Sauropoda; Morrison Formation - Latest Jurassic) PeerJ PrePrints 3:e838v1

Abstract

In the summer of 1878, American paleontologist Edward Drinker Cope published the discovery of a sauropod dinosaur that he named Amphicoelias fragillimus. What distinguishes A. fragillimus in the annals of paleontology is the immense magnitude of the skeletal material. The single incomplete dorsal vertebra as reported by Cope was a meter and a half in height, which when fully reconstructed, would make A. fragillimus the largest vertebrate ever. After this initial description Cope never mentioned A. fragillimus in any of his scientific works for the remainder of his life. More than four decades after its description, a scientific survey at the American Museum of Natural History dedicated to the sauropods collected by Cope failed to locate the remains or whereabouts of A. fragillimus. For nearly a century the remains have yet to resurface. The enormous size of the specimen has generally been accepted despite being well beyond the size of even the largest sauropods known from verifiable fossil material (e.g. Argentinosaurus). By deciphering the ontogenetic change of Diplodocoidea vertebrae, the science of gigantism, and Cope’s own mannerisms, we conclude that the reported size of A. fragillimus is most likely an extreme over-estimation.

Author Comment

This paper was originally released on December 15th, 2014 in the second issue of the open access online journal Volumina Jurassica. Unfortunately, the version released was not our intended final version. This mistake was due to a miscommunication on our part during the manuscript revision stage. All of the information pertaining to our assessment that the values reported by E.D. Cope represent typographical errors remains the same in this released version. The striking difference between the two versions pertains to the taxonomic stability and proposed future treatment of the genus Amphicoelias. Our intention with this version, released via PeerJ, is to serve as a supplemental or supporting file to the Volumina Jurassic version. Citations of this manuscript should still follow that of Volumina Jurassic. We greatly appreciate all of the help and assistance from the editors and staff of Volumina Jurassica, and we ask forgiveness from the journal and the readership for this discrepancy.