Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Mexican Welders Data-Set

Extended data-set of n = 66 (33 welders and 33 controls)

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.834v2/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Ana C. Jara-Ettinger conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Juan C. López-Tavera analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Guadalupe Zavala-Cerna contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper.

Olivia Torres-Bugarín conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The Human Research Ethics Committee at Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara approved this study. After a clear verbal explanation of the purposes, risks, and benefits from enrolling in the study, we obtained written informed consent from all research participants. We followed the Mexican laws for health related research projects on humans, established in PROYNOM-012-SSA3-2007 (DOF: 05-11-2009). In addition, the study met all the points stated in the Federal Law on Protection of Personal Data (DOF: 05-07-2010).

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of related data:

http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1304640

Funding

Funding for reactants and laboratory materials was provided by the Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies